ArticleOccupational therapy international2026
Reliability of Ultrasound Muscle Assessment in People With Critical Illness Performed by Occupational Therapy Students and Occupational Therapists.
Article in Occupational therapy international, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Reliability of Ultrasound Muscle Assessment in People With Critical Illness Performed by Occupational Therapy Students and Occupational Therapists.Occupational therapy international · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The use of ultrasound as an assessment tool by occupational therapists in the context of intensive care can support the clinical reasoning in identifying the impacts of musculoskeletal alterations on the ability to perform activities of daily living and other meaningful occupations. However, ultrasonography is not part of the core curriculum in occupational therapy education, and the knowledge and technical requirements necessary for its use by these professionals remain unclear. Therefore, the aim of this study was to analyze the intraexaminer and interexaminer reliability of ultrasound muscle assessment among occupational therapy students and occupational therapists after the completion of a standardized training program. Data collection included 8 h of examiner training and image acquisition. Three examiners were trained by an occupational therapist experienced in muscle assessment using ultrasound, including two occupational therapy undergraduate students and one occupational therapist. Each examiner performed two assessments of each muscle group, without knowing the results of their own evaluations or those of the other examiners. Participants were recruited by convenience, including adults and older people who were admitted to the intensive care unit. The sample size of this study was seven participants. For descriptive analyses, categorical variables were expressed in absolute and relative frequency. Continuous variables were presented as median and interquartile range or as mean and standard deviation. For the interobserver and intraobserver reliability analyses, the values of the intraclass correlation coefficient were performed. A total of 280 US images were analyzed. In regards to inter-examiner reliability, excellent results were found for all muscle groups (ICC: 0.785-0.986). For the intraexaminer reliability, excellent results were found in the majority of analyzes performed (ICC: 0.779-0.997), with two exceptions. Occupational therapy students and occupational therapists demonstrated excellent reliability in the ultrasound assessment of muscle thickness. These findings may support the clinical reasoning of occupational therapists to improve outcomes in occupational performance and participation of critically ill survivors.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.