Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41849577›Full record

ArticleJMIR research protocols2026

The Development and Protocol for Testing a Co-Created Digital Intervention (Sentinel) to Improve Mental Well-Being and Help Manage and Prevent Trauma in First Responders.

Nicola Cogan, Alison Kirk, Christoph Graf

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JMIR research protocols, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Nicola CoganDepartment of Psychological Sciences and Health, University of Strathclyde, 40 George Street, Glasgow, G1 1QE, United Kingdom, 44 141 548 ext 4153.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0861-5133
Alison KirkDepartment of Psychological Sciences and Health, University of Strathclyde, 40 George Street, Glasgow, G1 1QE, United Kingdom, 44 141 548 ext 4153.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6534-3763
Christoph GrafDepartment of Psychological Sciences and Health, University of Strathclyde, 40 George Street, Glasgow, G1 1QE, United Kingdom, 44 141 548 ext 4153.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0007-9038-9230

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: First responders (FRs) and frontline workers are frequently exposed to traumatic events within their professional roles. This exposure places them at risk of experiencing acute stress, posttraumatic stress disorder, burnout, and other adverse mental health outcomes. Despite growing awareness of these risks, there remains a lack of evidence-based digital interventions (DIs) tailored to meet their unique mental health needs. Objective: This study aims to address this gap by developing and testing Sentinel, an evidence-based, co-created DI to promote mental well-being, build resilience, and help manage and prevent trauma among FRs and frontline workers. The objectives include exploring their experiences of occupational trauma, identifying their preferences for digital mental health tools, and evaluating the feasibility of the Sentinel intervention. Methods: The development of Sentinel followed a rigorous, 4-phase approach. In phase 1, we conducted market analysis and in-depth qualitative interviews with 54 FRs from fire services, police, and emergency health sectors. The aim was to explore their mental health needs, barriers to accessing support, and views on the potential role of DIs in addressing these needs. In phase 2, we developed the content for Sentinel by integrating findings from phase 1 with existing evidence, policies, and theoretical frameworks, ensuring the intervention reflected the lived experiences of FRs. In phase 3, a high-fidelity clickable prototype of Sentinel will be tested through co-design workshops, iterative development sprints, and usability evaluations. Feedback from FRs and frontline workers during this phase will refine the app's design and functionality. Phase 4 involves a mixed methods, nonrandomized feasibility study to evaluate Sentinel's acceptability, usability, safety, and implementation potential. Quantitative data will be collected from up to 100 FRs, complemented by qualitative interviews with 30 FR participants and 20 health and social care professionals who refer FRs to the intervention. Results: The co-creation process has proven essential in ensuring Sentinel meets the specific needs of FRs and frontline workers. Preliminary feedback highlights the app's relevance and usability. Our pilot testing began in August 2025 and is planned for completion by August 2026. As of January 16, 2026, a total of 119 participants have completed the initial survey, and 59 have downloaded the Sentinel app, with 24 having used the app for 6 weeks and completed the follow-up survey. Of this group, 13 participants have consented to an interview. We are on track to meet our target recruitment sample, and these data will provide detailed insights to inform refinements and determine readiness for a larger efficacy trial. Conclusions: Sentinel represents a novel, personalized digital solution designed to address the unmet needs of FRs and frontline workers exposed to occupational trauma. Future work will evaluate its capacity to improve mental well-being, support trauma recovery, and build resilience.

Indexed as

Emergency RespondersMental HealthDigital HealthHumansPsychological Well-BeingQualitative ResearchStress Disorders, Post-Traumaticco-creationdigital interventionfirst respondersfrontline workersmental well-beingoccupational traumaparticipatory methodsresiliencetrauma management

Identifiers

PMID41849577
PMCPMC12998612

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.