ArticleScience advances2026
Alignment phase transition in socially driven motion.
Article in Science advances, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Collective fs movement is a hallmark of complex systems, exhibiting emergent order across contexts from pedestrian flows to biological collectives. In high-speed, directional settings, alignment ensures efficient navigation, whereas in low-speed, undirectional, socially engaged contexts, alignment arises from interpersonal interaction rather than locomotion goals. Using high-resolution spatial and orientation data from preschool classrooms, we uncover a sharp distance-dependent transition in pairwise alignment that reflects a spontaneous symmetry breaking between behavioral phases: Below a threshold of ~0.65 meters, side-by-side orientations dominate, while face-to-face orientations prevail at larger distances. This transition stems from a distance-dependent competition among three alignment mechanisms: parallelization, opposition, and reciprocation, whose interplay generates a bifurcation structure in the effective interaction potential. Fourier decomposition of orientation distributions reveals these mechanisms, enabling a minimal pseudopotential model that captures the transition as a nonequilibrium phase change. Monte Carlo simulations using inferred interaction terms reproduce empirical patterns, establishing a quantitative framework for social alignment with implications for biological collectives and artificial swarms.
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.