ReviewEndocrine-related cancer2026
Ageing and pituitary neuroendocrine tumours (PitNETs): from bench to bedside.
Review in Endocrine-related cancer, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Abstract: The prevalence of pituitary neuroendocrine tumours (PitNETs) in elderly people (≥65 years old) is raising with life expectancy. Despite an increasing incidental detection on neuroimaging for unrelated conditions, a large majority are macrotumours (≥1 cm) and mass effects are frequent, in particular visual defects. Clinically non-functioning PitNETs are the most prevalent (about 75%), and a majority are gonadotrophs. The clinical presentation of functioning PitNETs differ from younger patients and include somatotroph tumours - often intrasellar with mild acromegaly, prolactinomas - often large and invasive, and rare corticotroph and uncommon thyrotroph tumours. Such epidemiological characteristics likely reflect different biological features as compared with PitNETs diagnosed in younger patients. Epigenetic alterations are more frequent than mutations, whereas cell senescence and age-related changes in immune surveillance and feedback mechanisms from ageing target organs may play an underestimated role. Endocrinological changes associated with ageing and concomitant pathological conditions should be considered as relevant confounding factors for diagnosis. In particular, ocular diseases may mask visual defects, progressive symptoms of hypopituitarism may be misinterpreted as ageing, and peripheral physiological (menopause) or pathological dysfunction or drugs given for other diseases can alter pituitary hormone secretion. Mild hypersecretion should be searched for in clinically non-functioning cases, as it may significantly impact on clinical management. Multidisciplinary evaluation is necessary to define personalized therapeutic goals, and where indicated, surgery should be performed by experienced pituitary surgeons. The development of innovative diagnostic and prognostic markers would usefully support the clinical management and follow-up of PitNETs in elderly patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.