ArticleJournal of bone metabolism2026
Cross-Calibration of Bone Mineral Density and Body Composition between GE Lunar Prodigy and Hologic Horizon W Dual Energy X-Ray Absorptiometry Systems.
Article in Journal of bone metabolism, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundDual energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) measurements vary among instruments from different manufacturers. This study aimed to assess the correlation between bone mineral density (BMD) and body composition measured by the GE Lunar Prodigy and Hologic Horizon W DXA systems and to develop conversion equations.
methodsA total of 120 healthy volunteers (59 males, 61 females) aged 20 to 70 years were scanned on both DXA systems on the same day. BMD was measured at the lumbar spine (L1-L4) and bilateral femurs. Body composition parameters were measured for the whole body and regional sites. Bland-Altman analysis, Pearson correlation, and concordance correlation coefficient (CCC) were used to assess agreement. Linear regression was performed to derive conversion equations.
resultsThe Hologic system measured BMD values 14% to 20% lower at the lumbar spine and 8% to 17% lower at femoral sites compared to the GE Lunar system (all P<0.0001). Lean mass values were 4% to 10% lower on the Hologic system. Very strong correlations were observed for both BMD (r=0.944-0.980) and lean mass (r=0.963-0.984). Cross-calibration equations were developed for all measurement sites.
conclusionsDespite significant systematic differences, there was very high correlation between the two DXA systems. The conversion equations can facilitate comparison of measurements between these systems in clinical practice and research.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.