ArticleScientific reports2026
Optimizing charge discharge cycles using QPPONet-enabled hybrid learning framework for energy management and safety in electric vehicles.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- CORAL: co-evolutionary optimization of routing and adaptive prompts for cost-efficient LLM deployment.Frontiers in artificial intelligence · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The move toward the use of electric vehicles has underscored some serious 3.4s in traditional Battery Management System (BMS), which highly relies on the rule-based logic and empirical formulations. These systems fail to cope with these changing battery conditions, which usually leads to inaccurate health forecasts, poor energy consumption, and high safety hazards. This study suggests an adaptive, intelligence-driven BMS architecture, which makes use of machine learning and reinforcement learning algorithms to address the following intrinsic constraints. In the case of State of Health (SOH) estimation, the Gradient Boosting model performed best, having almost perfect accuracy in prediction on both proprietary and open-source datasets with a range of R2 at 0.9926–0.9995, which is much better than other models, namely, Random Forest, Extreme Gradient Boosting, and Long Short-Term Memory (LSTM) networks. A hybrid LSTM-GRU model in Remaining Useful Life (RUL) prediction had a Root Mean Square Error (RMSE) of 3.36 and a Mean Absolute Error (MAE) of 2.09 and was able to better predict long-term dynamics of degradation than a standalone recurrent model. The hybrid QPPONet (DQN and PPO) reinforcement learning approach led to a 24 ± 1.2% gain in cumulative reward while making balanced efficiency and degradation management trade-offs. Meanwhile, system safety was enhanced by means of unsupervised anomaly detection with the Isolation Forest and One-Class SVM algorithms, which delivered more than 92% accuracy in terms of early thermal runaway detection. Instead of putting all modules together into one pipeline, each component was verified separately to allow modular, scalable integration into a wide range of hardware and deployment environments. The framework was tested on a proprietary high-resolution EV dataset and on the publicly available eVTOL dataset, showing strong generalization across heterogeneous cycling conditions. These results establish a scalable roadmap toward intelligent, secure, and adaptive BMS architectures, thereby informing the broader pursuit of reliable, sustainable electric mobility.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.