ArticleScientific reports2026
A practical ML framework for biomass torrefaction analysis and simulator deployment.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Torrefaction is an effective thermochemical pretreatment for upgrading agricultural and forestry biomass into solid biofuels; however, selecting operating conditions remains challenging due to trade-offs between mass yield and energy densification. In this study, a comprehensive machine-learning framework was developed to predict biomass mass yield and higher heating value using an experimental dataset collected from diverse torrefaction studies. Multiple regression algorithms-including linear, ensemble, boosting, and kernel-based models-were systematically compared with and without hyperparameter tuning. Domain-informed feature engineering and rigorous data preprocessing were applied to enhance predictive reliability and interpretability. Among the evaluated models, tree-based ensemble and boosting algorithms, particularly CatBoost, showed robust performance and stable feature attribution for both MY and HHV. Rather than treating prediction accuracy as an endpoint, the models were integrated into a GUI-based simulator that enables simultaneous evaluation of MY and HHV under identical operating conditions, visualizes trade-offs, and identifies feasible operating windows without exhaustive trial-and-error. This approach demonstrates how ML can function as a practical engineering tool for torrefaction screening and condition selection, complementing traditional empirical methods.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.