ArticleRespiratory research2026
Detecting sleep apnea using non-linear measures of heart rate variability.
Article in Respiratory research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Detecting sleep apnea using non-linear measures of heart rate variability.Respiratory research · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundSleep apnea is highly prevalent yet frequently underdiagnosed due to the cost and complexity of polysomnography. Heart rate variability (HRV) offers a scalable alternative for early screening, but conventional HRV metrics often overlook the multi-scale autonomic disturbances characteristic of apnea.
methodsWe evaluated scale-dependent detrended fluctuation analysis (sDFA), which quantifies how heartbeat-interval correlations evolve across temporal scales, using RR-interval data from Sleep Heart Health Study ([Formula: see text]). The discriminative performance of sDFA was compared with conventional HRV measures across mild, moderate, and severe apnea, and within cardiovascular disease (CVD) subgroups. Propensity score matching was applied for age and body mass index, and analyses were stratified by sex.
resultsAcross apnea severity levels, sDFA consistently outperformed conventional HRV measures in discriminating individuals with sleep apnea. Performance gains were particularly evident in severe apnea and remained robust in participants with CVD, a subgroup in which traditional HRV metrics showed reduced discriminative ability. sDFA revealed scale-specific signatures of autonomic dysfunction that were not captured by conventional time- and frequency-domain HRV measures.
conclusionMulti-scale analysis of HRV using sDFA enhances the detection of sleep apnea across severity levels and cardiovascular risk profiles. These findings highlight the limitations of conventional HRV metrics and support sDFA as a promising tool for scalable, HRV-based sleep apnea screening, with potential for integration into wearable and ambulatory monitoring systems.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.