Evidence mapPaperPMID 41851782Full record

Trial reportNutrition journal2026

Cow's milk compared to oat drink and its implications for lipid profile- a pilot randomized controlled trial.

Hanne Rosendahl-Riise, Eline Olsen Gravrok, Sarah Louise Rung, Jutta Dierkes, Inger Aakre

Registry-linked trialAbstract readRandomized Controlled TrialComparative Study
In one paragraph

Trial report in Nutrition journal, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06764173 (The Difference in Health Outcomes After Drinking Cow's Milk Compared to Oat Milk - a Pilot Randomized Controlled Study), which is not on this map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06764173 nacompletednot on this map

The Difference in Health Outcomes After Drinking Cow's Milk Compared to Oat Milk - a Pilot Randomized Controlled Study

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of BergenRan2024 to 2024Enrolled32ConditionsPlant-based Milk, Iodine Nutrition Status, LipidsArmsOat drink, Cow's milk
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Hanne Rosendahl-RiiseCentre for Nutrition, Department of Clinical Medicine, University of Bergen, Jonas Lies vei 91, Bergen, N-5020, Norway. hanne.rosendahl-riise@uib.no.
Eline Olsen GravrokDepartment of Clinical Medicine, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway.
Sarah Louise RungDepartment of Clinical Medicine, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway.
Jutta DierkesCentre for Nutrition, Department of Clinical Medicine, University of Bergen, Jonas Lies vei 91, Bergen, N-5020, Norway.
Inger AakreInstitute of Marine Research, Bergen, Norway.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A recent dietary trend involves replacing cow’s milk with plant-based drink alternatives. This shift is motivated by the perception that plant-based options are healthier and more environmentally sustainable. One of the most popular options is oat drink; however, the health effects of consuming oat drink as a replacement for cow’ s milk are not well studied. The EFSA health claims state that beta-glucans in oat drink have beneficial effects on cholesterol; however, consumption of oat drink at doses aligned with food-based guidelines for milk and dairy products has not been examined in real-world scenarios.Thus, the primary goal of this pilot randomized controlled trial was to assess the effectiveness of consuming 600 mL of oat drink daily versus 600 mL of cow’s milk daily over four weeks on blood lipids (total cholesterol, LDL-cholesterol, HDL-cholesterol, and triglycerides) in healthy young women in a real-world setting. A four-week, open-label, parallel-arm randomized controlled trial was conducted on women aged 18–40 years who habitually drink cow’s milk. Participants were randomized 1:1 to consume either 600 mL/day of oat drink or 600 mL/day of semi-skimmed cow’s milk. Two baseline visits were conducted before the intervention, during which informed consent, anthropometric measurements, 24-hour recalls, and blood samples were collected. During the intervention, participants recorded their milk intake in compliance diaries. Two final visits were held at the end of the study, where dietary recalls, anthropometry, and blood samples were repeated.Of the 33 women enrolled, 32 completed the trial. Baseline characteristics were similar across groups, including age (median 23 years), BMI (median 22. 9 kg/m ²), and dietary intake. Over the four weeks, the oat drink group experienced a significant reduction in mean total cholesterol (-0.3 mmol/L (95% CI 0.6 to 0.0; p = 0.026) and LDL-cholesterol (–0.4 mmol/L (95% CI − 0.6 to − 0. 2; p = 0.002), compared to the cow’ s milk control group. No differences were observed between the groups in HDL- cholesterol, or triglycerides.In conclusion, these results indicate that replacing cow’s milk with oat drink may lead to modest reductions in total and LDL‑cholesterol over four weeks in healthy young women under real-world conditions. The compliance and feasibility of this effectiveness study were good, with high compliance rates. ClinicalTrials.gov NCT06764173.

Indexed as

AvenaBeveragesLipidsMilkAdolescentAdultAnimalsBody Mass IndexCattleCholesterolCholesterol, HDLCholesterol, LDLFemaleHumansPilot ProjectsTriglyceridesCholesterolCholesterol, HDLCholesterol, LDLLipidsTriglyceridesCow’s milkLDL-cholesterolOat drinkPilot randomized controlled trial

Identifiers

PMID41851782
PMCPMC13112611

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.