Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41852240›Full record

ArticleAddiction (Abingdon, England)2026

Low and no alcohol availability and sales in small retailers in Great Britain: A geographic longitudinal analysis from 2018 to 2022.

Roberto Valiente, Helena Tunstall, Luke B Wilson, Duncan Gillespie, Jamie Pearce, Niamh K Shortt

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Addiction (Abingdon, England), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Roberto ValienteCentre for Research on Society and Health (CRESH), School of GeoSciences, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1016-0548
Helena TunstallCentre for Research on Society and Health (CRESH), School of GeoSciences, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0895-9078
Luke B WilsonSPECTRUM Consortium, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5769-5729
Duncan GillespieSPECTRUM Consortium, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3450-5747
Jamie PearceCentre for Research on Society and Health (CRESH), School of GeoSciences, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0994-7140
Niamh K ShorttCentre for Research on Society and Health (CRESH), School of GeoSciences, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8573-7794

Funding

Cancer Research UK PPRCTAGPJT\100011UK Prevention Research Partnership MR/S037519/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND

aimsThe United Kingdom Government is committed to reducing alcohol consumption through increasing the availability of alcohol-free and low-alcohol (No/Lo) drinks; however, little is known about whether these products are equally available across different types of neighbourhoods, which may have implications for inequalities in potential health benefits or harms from exposure to No/Lo drinks. This study measured differences in the availability and sales of No/Lo products in small retailers across disparate types of neighbourhoods in Great Britain and over time.

designA longitudinal geographic design using retail transaction data collected over 20 weeks seasonally distributed between 2018 and 2022.

settingThe study was conducted in Great Britain (England, Scotland and Wales). PARTICIPANTS/CASES: 11 278 479 alcohol transactions across 1432 small retailers in neighbourhoods with varying levels of socioeconomic deprivation and urbanicity. MEASUREMENTS: No/Lo products were defined as alcoholic-mimic beverages containing ≤1.2% alcohol by volume (ABV). Each week, we calculated retail-level outcomes measuring No/Lo product availability defined as product range and sales volume (standardised as the number of serving units). Zero-inflated Poisson regression models were used to assess differences in these outcomes by neighbourhood income deprivation and urbanicity over time.

findingsNo/Lo sales volume tripled over the study period yet accounted for only 0.25% of total alcohol sales by 2022. In 2018, 34% of retailers reported sales of No/Lo products, rising to 68% by 2022. Retailers in low-deprivation areas were more likely to sell No/Lo products and sold a wider product range compared with those in high-deprivation areas ([incidence rate ratio (IRR) = 2.30, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 1.60-3.30 in 2022). No/Lo alcohol sales volume was statistically significantly higher among retailers in the least deprived neighbourhoods (IRR = 1.33, 95% CI = 1.14-1.57 in 2022) and rural areas compared with high-deprivation and urban areas, but only in the most recent years.

conclusionAlcohol-free and low alcohol (No/Lo) product availability and sales increased among small retailers in Great Britain between 2018 and 2022, but these gains have been uneven, with greater access and uptake in more affluent and rural areas. This suggests emerging geographic disparities in access to and sales of No/Lo alternatives and their potential benefits or harms.

Indexed as

Alcohol DrinkingAlcoholic BeveragesCommerceNeighborhood CharacteristicsDrinking EstablishmentsHumansLongitudinal StudiesResidence CharacteristicsUnited Kingdomalcohol availabilityalcohol salescommercial determinants of healthgeographic inequalitiesNo/Lo alcoholretail‐panel datasocio‐economic disparities

Identifiers

PMID41852240
PMCPMC13291110

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.