ReviewLiver international : official journal of the International Association for the Study of the Liver2026
Care Pathways for Metabolic Dysfunction-Associated Steatotic Liver Disease (MASLD): A State-of-The-Art Review.
Review in Liver international : official journal of the International Association for the Study of the Liver, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- Care Pathways for Metabolic Dysfunction-Associated Steatotic Liver Disease (MASLD): A State-of-The-Art Review.Liver international : official journal of the International Association for the Study of the Liver · 2026Review
- Close multilevel links between metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease and type 2 diabetes mellitus.Metabolism open · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
17 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Metabolic dysfunction-Associated Steatotic Liver Disease (MASLD) is a growing clinical challenge, necessitating effective diagnostic strategies to identify advanced liver fibrosis while minimising unnecessary referrals of mild cases. Current clinical guidelines recommend care pathways utilising non-invasive tests (NITs) to stratify patients, but the optimal diagnostic algorithm across care settings remains unclear. This state-of-the-art review systematically examines studies describing clinical care pathways for detecting advanced fibrotic MASLD and stratifying patients at risk. A comprehensive literature search of MEDLINE, Embase, Cochrane Library, and Scopus, finalised in January 2026, identified nine relevant studies that met predefined criteria including structured care plans and applicability beyond diagnosis alone. Pathway populations included patients at risk for MASLD (type 2 diabetes (n = 4) or broad range cardiometabolic risk factors (n = 1)) or confirmed MASLD (n = 4). The most frequently employed NITs were FIB-4 and vibration-controlled transient elastography (VCTE). Numbers needed to screen (NNS) for hepatology referral and advanced fibrosis detection varied considerably across pathways and populations, reflecting heterogeneity in design and fibrosis assessment methods. All studies reported improved patient risk stratification; attendance rates declined at each pathway step. Findings suggest that NIT-based clinical care pathways can effectively align patient management and optimise transmural care for MASLD. Nonetheless, heterogeneity in pathway design and fibrosis determination highlights the need for standardised protocols and validation in larger, at-risk cohorts to strengthen evidence supporting widespread adoption. This review contributes to advancing MASLD management within evolving clinical frameworks.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.