Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41852336›Full record

ReviewLiver international : official journal of the International Association for the Study of the Liver2026

Care Pathways for Metabolic Dysfunction-Associated Steatotic Liver Disease (MASLD): A State-of-The-Art Review.

Kirsi M A van Eekhout, Leonard D Broekman, Vivian D de Jong, Maurice Michel, Rick Grobbee, Douglas Maya-Miles, Manuel Romero-Gómez, Jean Muris, Juan M Mendive, Yasaman Vali and 7 more

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Liver international : official journal of the International Association for the Study of the Liver, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Care Pathways for Metabolic Dysfunction-Associated Steatotic Liver Disease (MASLD): A State-of-The-Art Review.Liver international : official journal of the International Association for the Study of the Liver · 2026
    Review
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors.

Kirsi M A van EekhoutDepartment of Vascular and Internal Medicine, Amsterdam University Medical Centre, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.ORCID 0009-0004-0440-2063
Leonard D BroekmanDepartment of Vascular and Internal Medicine, Amsterdam University Medical Centre, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Vivian D de JongDepartment of Global Public Health & Bioethics, Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands.
Maurice MichelDepartment of Internal Medicine II, Saarland University Medical Center, Saarland University, Homburg, Germany.
Rick GrobbeeDepartment of Global Public Health & Bioethics, Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands.
Douglas Maya-MilesSeLiver Group, Instituto de Biomedicina de Sevilla/CSIC/Virgen del Rocío University Hospital, University of Seville, Seville, Spain/Centro De Investigación Biomédica en Red de Enfermedades Hepáticas y Digestivas (CIBEREHD), Seville, Spain.
Manuel Romero-GómezUCM Digestive Diseases. Virgen del Rocio University Hospital, Institute of Biomedicine of Seville, CIBEREHD, University of Seville, Seville, Spain.ORCID 0000-0001-8494-8947
Jean MurisCare and Public Health Research Institute (CAPHRI), Department of Family Medicine, Maastricht University, Maastricht, the Netherlands.
Juan M MendiveDepartment of Family Medicine, La Mina Primary Health Care Academic Centre, University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.ORCID 0000-0001-8095-7707
Yasaman ValiDepartment of Epidemiology and Data Science, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0001-7002-118X
Oscar H FrancoDepartment of Global Public Health & Bioethics, Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands.
Jörn M SchattenbergDepartment of Internal Medicine II, Saarland University Medical Center, Saarland University, Homburg, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-4224-4703
Céline Fournier-PoizatEchosens, Paris, France.
Manuel Castro CabezasJulius Clinical, Zeist, the Netherlands.
Maarten E TushuizenDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Leiden University Medical Centre, University of Leiden, Leiden, the Netherlands.
Adriaan G HolleboomDepartment of Vascular and Internal Medicine, Amsterdam University Medical Centre, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
GRIPonMASH consortium

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Metabolic dysfunction-Associated Steatotic Liver Disease (MASLD) is a growing clinical challenge, necessitating effective diagnostic strategies to identify advanced liver fibrosis while minimising unnecessary referrals of mild cases. Current clinical guidelines recommend care pathways utilising non-invasive tests (NITs) to stratify patients, but the optimal diagnostic algorithm across care settings remains unclear. This state-of-the-art review systematically examines studies describing clinical care pathways for detecting advanced fibrotic MASLD and stratifying patients at risk. A comprehensive literature search of MEDLINE, Embase, Cochrane Library, and Scopus, finalised in January 2026, identified nine relevant studies that met predefined criteria including structured care plans and applicability beyond diagnosis alone. Pathway populations included patients at risk for MASLD (type 2 diabetes (n = 4) or broad range cardiometabolic risk factors (n = 1)) or confirmed MASLD (n = 4). The most frequently employed NITs were FIB-4 and vibration-controlled transient elastography (VCTE). Numbers needed to screen (NNS) for hepatology referral and advanced fibrosis detection varied considerably across pathways and populations, reflecting heterogeneity in design and fibrosis assessment methods. All studies reported improved patient risk stratification; attendance rates declined at each pathway step. Findings suggest that NIT-based clinical care pathways can effectively align patient management and optimise transmural care for MASLD. Nonetheless, heterogeneity in pathway design and fibrosis determination highlights the need for standardised protocols and validation in larger, at-risk cohorts to strengthen evidence supporting widespread adoption. This review contributes to advancing MASLD management within evolving clinical frameworks.

Indexed as

Critical PathwaysFatty LiverLiver CirrhosisNon-alcoholic Fatty Liver DiseaseElasticity Imaging TechniquesHumansRisk Factorscare pathwaychronic liver diseaseliver fibrosismetabolic dysfunction‐associated steatohepatitismetabolic dysfunction‐associated steatotic liver disease

Identifiers

PMID41852336
PMCPMC13000678

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.