Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41852856›Full record

ArticleThe journal of allergy and clinical immunology. Global2026

Dupilumab in patients with cold urticaria: Results from a phase 3 trial.

Martin Metz, Sarbjit S Saini, Akiko Yagami, Rémi Gagnon, Ana M Giménez-Arnau, Xiaodong Luo, Lacey B Robinson, Renata Martinčová, Allen Radin, Melanie Makhija

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The journal of allergy and clinical immunology. Global, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04681729 (A Randomized, Double-blind, Placebo-controlled, Multi-center, Parallel-group Study of Dupilumab in Patients With Chronic Inducible Cold Urticaria Who Remain Symptomatic Despite the Use of H1-antihistamine Treatment), which is not on this map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04681729 phase3completednot on this map

A Randomized, Double-blind, Placebo-controlled, Multi-center, Parallel-group Study of Dupilumab in Patients With Chronic Inducible Cold Urticaria Who Remain Symptomatic Despite the Use of H1-antihistamine Treatment

TypeinterventionalSponsorSanofiRan2020 to 2023Enrolled82ConditionsCold UrticariaArmsDupilumab SAR231893, Placebo, Non sedating H1-antihistamine
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Martin MetzInstitute of Allergology, Charité, Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
Sarbjit S SainiDivision of Allergy and Clinical Immunology, Department of Medicine, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Johns Hopkins Asthma and Allergy Center, Baltimore, Md.
Akiko YagamiFujita Health University School of Medicine, Aichi, Japan.
Rémi GagnonClinique Spécialisée en Allergie de la Capitale, Québec City, Québec, Canada.
Ana M Giménez-ArnauDepartment of Dermatology, Hospital del Mar Research Institute, Universitat Pompeu Fabra, Barcelona, Spain.
Xiaodong LuoSanofi, Morristown, NJ.
Lacey B RobinsonSanofi, Cambridge, Mass.
Renata MartinčováSanofi, Prague, Czech Republic.
Allen RadinRegeneron Pharmaceuticals Inc, Tarrytown, NY.
Melanie MakhijaSanofi, Cambridge, Mass.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Cold urticaria (ColdU) is a chronic inducible urticaria characterized by the appearance of itchy wheals and/or angioedema following contact with cold. Although dupilumab treatment showed significant improvements in chronic spontaneous urticaria, there are currently no approved therapies for ColdU. Objective: Our aim was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of dupilumab in adult and adolescent patients with ColdU who remain symptomatic despite the use of antihistamines. Methods: LIBERTY-CINDU CUrIADS (ClinicalTrial.gov identifier NCT04681729) was a phase 3, randomized, double-blind, parallel-group, placebo-controlled, multicenter trial in which patients aged 12 years or older who had ColdU received dupilumab, 300 mg, or placebo every 2 weeks. The efficacy and safety of dupilumab were assessed after a 24-week treatment period. The primary end point was the proportion of patients with a negative ice cube provocation test result at week 24. The key secondary end points were change from baseline in Peak Pruritus Numeric Rating Scale score at the provocation site, and health-related quality of life, as measured by Dermatology Life Quality Index. Results: In total, 82 adult patients were enrolled in the study. There were no statistically significant differences between the dupilumab and placebo recipients in terms of primary or secondary end points. The proportion of adult patients with ColdU with treatment-emergent adverse events was lower with dupilumab than with placebo (53.5% vs 69.2%). Conclusion: Dupilumab treatment did not lead to statistically significant improvements in signs and symptoms of ColdU as compared with placebo over the 24-week treatment period.

Indexed as

autoimmune diseasecold urticariadupilumabUrticaria

Identifiers

PMID41852856
PMCPMC12993899

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.