ArticleThe journal of allergy and clinical immunology. Global2026
Dupilumab in patients with cold urticaria: Results from a phase 3 trial.
Article in The journal of allergy and clinical immunology. Global, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04681729 (A Randomized, Double-blind, Placebo-controlled, Multi-center, Parallel-group Study of Dupilumab in Patients With Chronic Inducible Cold Urticaria Who Remain Symptomatic Despite the Use of H1-antihistamine Treatment), which is not on this map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
A Randomized, Double-blind, Placebo-controlled, Multi-center, Parallel-group Study of Dupilumab in Patients With Chronic Inducible Cold Urticaria Who Remain Symptomatic Despite the Use of H1-antihistamine Treatment
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Cold urticaria (ColdU) is a chronic inducible urticaria characterized by the appearance of itchy wheals and/or angioedema following contact with cold. Although dupilumab treatment showed significant improvements in chronic spontaneous urticaria, there are currently no approved therapies for ColdU. Objective: Our aim was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of dupilumab in adult and adolescent patients with ColdU who remain symptomatic despite the use of antihistamines. Methods: LIBERTY-CINDU CUrIADS (ClinicalTrial.gov identifier NCT04681729) was a phase 3, randomized, double-blind, parallel-group, placebo-controlled, multicenter trial in which patients aged 12 years or older who had ColdU received dupilumab, 300 mg, or placebo every 2 weeks. The efficacy and safety of dupilumab were assessed after a 24-week treatment period. The primary end point was the proportion of patients with a negative ice cube provocation test result at week 24. The key secondary end points were change from baseline in Peak Pruritus Numeric Rating Scale score at the provocation site, and health-related quality of life, as measured by Dermatology Life Quality Index. Results: In total, 82 adult patients were enrolled in the study. There were no statistically significant differences between the dupilumab and placebo recipients in terms of primary or secondary end points. The proportion of adult patients with ColdU with treatment-emergent adverse events was lower with dupilumab than with placebo (53.5% vs 69.2%). Conclusion: Dupilumab treatment did not lead to statistically significant improvements in signs and symptoms of ColdU as compared with placebo over the 24-week treatment period.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.