ReviewMayo Clinic proceedings. Digital health2026
Early Implications for Solid Organ Transplantation With the Use of Artificial Intelligence From a Bibliometric Perspective.
Review in Mayo Clinic proceedings. Digital health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Artificial intelligence (AI) is increasingly transforming health care, particularly in solid organ transplantation, where it addresses complex challenges such as organ allocation, graft rejection prediction, and immunosuppressive management. This bibliometric analysis evaluated the scientific impact and evolution of AI applications in kidney, liver, heart, and lung transplantation. A comprehensive search across PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science identified 2384 publications from 1989 to 2025, of which 815 met inclusion criteria after double-blind screening with Rayyan AI. Coauthorship, keyword co-occurrence, and collaboration networks were analyzed using VOSviewer and Bibliometrix. The United States led in publications, citations, and collaboration strength, with Mayo Clinic emerging as the most productive institution, followed by China. Machine learning, expert systems, and deep learning were the most frequently applied AI techniques, whereas kidney and liver transplantation were the most extensively studied. Thematic clusters included rejection prediction, patient survival, organ allocation, postoperative monitoring, and immunosuppression personalization. Artificial intelligence-driven models integrate clinical, immunological, histological, and imaging data to enhance predictive accuracy, support clinical decision making, and improve graft and patient outcomes. Although many of these models remain under validation, early findings indicate strong potential to optimize patient care and surgical outcomes. This study highlights global research trends and emphasizes the need for interdisciplinary collaboration to develop context-specific AI tools. Moreover, promoting bibliometric literacy among health care professionals may strengthen evidence-based research and accelerate the responsible integration of AI into transplant medicine.
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.