Evidence mapPaperPMID 41853188Full record

ReviewMayo Clinic proceedings. Digital health2026

Early Implications for Solid Organ Transplantation With the Use of Artificial Intelligence From a Bibliometric Perspective.

Aliza Naomi Márquez Cabral, Carlos Alejandro Martínez-Zamora, Oscar Abraham José Padilla Solís, Ángel Lee, Alejandro Rossano García

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Mayo Clinic proceedings. Digital health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Aliza Naomi Márquez CabralSocial Service, Grupo Médico Rossano, Universidad del Valle de México, Ciudad de México, México.
Carlos Alejandro Martínez-ZamoraHospital Ángeles Acoxpa, Ciudad de México, México.
Oscar Abraham José Padilla SolísUniversidad de Guanajuato, Guanajuato, México.
Ángel LeeHospital Ángeles del Pedregal, Ciudad de México, México.
Alejandro Rossano GarcíaTransplant and Hepatopancreatobiliar Surgeon, Grupo Médico Rossano, Hospital Ángeles Pedregal, Ciudad de México, México.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Artificial intelligence (AI) is increasingly transforming health care, particularly in solid organ transplantation, where it addresses complex challenges such as organ allocation, graft rejection prediction, and immunosuppressive management. This bibliometric analysis evaluated the scientific impact and evolution of AI applications in kidney, liver, heart, and lung transplantation. A comprehensive search across PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science identified 2384 publications from 1989 to 2025, of which 815 met inclusion criteria after double-blind screening with Rayyan AI. Coauthorship, keyword co-occurrence, and collaboration networks were analyzed using VOSviewer and Bibliometrix. The United States led in publications, citations, and collaboration strength, with Mayo Clinic emerging as the most productive institution, followed by China. Machine learning, expert systems, and deep learning were the most frequently applied AI techniques, whereas kidney and liver transplantation were the most extensively studied. Thematic clusters included rejection prediction, patient survival, organ allocation, postoperative monitoring, and immunosuppression personalization. Artificial intelligence-driven models integrate clinical, immunological, histological, and imaging data to enhance predictive accuracy, support clinical decision making, and improve graft and patient outcomes. Although many of these models remain under validation, early findings indicate strong potential to optimize patient care and surgical outcomes. This study highlights global research trends and emphasizes the need for interdisciplinary collaboration to develop context-specific AI tools. Moreover, promoting bibliometric literacy among health care professionals may strengthen evidence-based research and accelerate the responsible integration of AI into transplant medicine.

Identifiers

PMID41853188
PMCPMC12992093

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.