ArticleResuscitation plus2026
Nationwide analysis of mortality predictors following in-hospital cardiac arrest in older Thai adults, 2016-2024.
Article in Resuscitation plus, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: In-hospital cardiac arrest (IHCA) is common among older adults, but recent detailed studies in Thailand on trends or factors related to hospital mortality in this group are lacking. This study aimed to analyze trends in in-hospital cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) among older adults, their outcomes, and survival factors to hospital discharge using the national database from 2016 to 2024. Methods: National data from Thailand's National Health Security Office covered all inpatients aged ≥60 years who received IHCA during 2016-2024, defined by the International Statistical Classification of Diseases and Related Health Problems, 10th Revision, Thai Modification (ICD-10-TM) based on ICD-9-99.6. Retrospective data from discharge summaries examined age-adjusted prevalence and survival rates of older CPR patients, normalized to 100,000 Thais, focusing on survival after CPR and associated factors of discharge mortality. Results: A total of 190,271 older patients received CPR. The most common primary diagnosis was cardiovascular disease (41.4%). Age-adjusted CPR rates were 221/100,000 males and 147/100,000 females. The survival rate to hospital discharge was 33%, with age-adjusted rates of 72/100,000 males and 50/100,000 females. Mortality was linked to male gender (adjusted odds ratio [AOR] 1.06), older age (AOR 70-79: 1.11; over 80: 1.30), specific diagnoses, arrest types (AOR for non-shockable 1.21; shockable 0.39-0.69), and procedures like coronary artery bypass Grafting (AOR 0.21), intra-aortic balloon pump (AOR 2.05), pacemaker (AOR 0.24), extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (AOR 5.18), and mechanical ventilation ≥96 h (AOR 0.88). Conclusions: CPR rates were higher in older males than in females. Cardiovascular disease was the main primary diagnosis. Overall survival to hospital discharge was about 33%. Mortality was linked to male sex, older age, cardiac rhythm types, diagnoses, and procedures.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.