Evidence mapPaperPMID 41853705Full record

ArticleCannabis (Albuquerque, N.M.)2026

Clinical Experience and Student Support for Medical Cannabis Use: A Secondary Analysis.

Andrew W Tong, Chloe J DuBoux, Rebecca H Seuferer, Thomas A Clobes, Francis W Siu, Bryan Magana, Joshua M Gold, Julia Bensing-Ruiz

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cannabis (Albuquerque, N.M.), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Andrew W TongDepartment of Health Sciences, California State University Channel Islands.
Chloe J DuBouxDepartment of Psychology, California State University Channel Islands.
Rebecca H SeufererDepartment of Psychology, California State University Channel Islands.
Thomas A ClobesDepartment of Health Sciences, California State University Channel Islands.
Francis W SiuDepartment of Biology, California State University Channel Islands.
Bryan MaganaDepartment of Health Sciences, California State University Channel Islands.
Joshua M GoldDepartment of Health Sciences, California State University Channel Islands.
Julia Bensing-RuizDepartment of Health Sciences, California State University Channel Islands.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: As medical cannabis (MC) legalization expands across the United States, understanding the factors shaping healthcare students' support for its use is essential to informing educational practices and reducing stigma in clinical care. Method: This secondary analysis examined factors associated with students' support for medical cannabis use (SFMCU), including clinical experience, personal cannabis use, demographic characteristics, and variation across patient vignettes. Participants ( Results: Students with clinical experience demonstrated significantly lower SFMCU compared to those without such experience ( Conclusions: Findings indicate that clinical experience, personal cannabis use, and demographic factors each influence students' attitudes toward MC. Students with healthcare experience exhibited lower support, possibly reflecting exposure to traditional medical norms or institutional stigma. These results underscore the need to integrate evidence-based MC education into healthcare curricula to enhance student knowledge, address misconceptions, and prepare future professionals to engage in informed, stigma-free patient care.

Indexed as

clinical experiencehealthcare educationmedical cannabisstigmastudent attitudes

Identifiers

PMID41853705
PMCPMC12993989

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.