ArticleInternational journal of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease2026
Sedentary Behavior Interventions in COPD: A Scoping Review of Strategies, Behavior Change Techniques, and Device-Measured Outcomes.
Article in International journal of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Sedentary behavior is an independent risk factor for disease progression and mortality in COPD patients. However, there is a lack of systematic research on its intervention strategies in China. We provide, in a domestic context, a scoping synthesis of this field that underscores the necessity for more robust and localized research. Purpose: This scoping review aims to clarify the characteristics, effectiveness, and BCTs of sedentary behavior interventions for COPD patients. Methods: Following the scoping review method proposed by Arksey. A comprehensive search was conducted across eight electronic databases, including PubMed, Embase, the Cochrane Library, Web of Science, CNKI, WanFang Data, CBM, and VIP. The search time frame encompassed records from the inception of each respective database up to August 20, 2025. The study selection, data extraction, and coding of the BCTs were all performed independently by two researchers. Results: The 6 included studies (comprising 4 RCTs, one quasi-experimental, and one case-control study) were primarily conducted in China and Europe, with sample sizes ranging from 30 to 327 and intervention durations of 6 to 24 weeks. Four studies reported reduced sedentary time, while two found no statistically significant difference. Guided by the BCW, the interventions in four studies included components such as knowledge education, use of wearable devices, and Nordic walking. Applied BCTs (Goals and Planning, Feedback and Monitoring, etc) primarily targeted the COM-B components of Psychological Capability and Reflective Motivation. Conclusion: The combined evidence suggests that most interventions reduce both total daily sedentary time and prolonged sitting bouts. However, the evidence base remains limited by regional concentration, short follow-ups, and heterogeneity.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.