ArticleBMJ open sport & exercise medicine2026
Interrupting sedentary behaviour in the workplace through active breaks: a protocol study.
Article in BMJ open sport & exercise medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Sedentary behaviour (SB) is linked to a higher risk of metabolic disorders, cardiovascular disease, all-cause mortality and musculoskeletal decline. Office workers (OW) are particularly vulnerable to prolonged SB due to the nature of their work. Incorporating active breaks (ABs), brief periods of physical activity (PA) during the workday may offer a promising strategy to interrupt SB in this setting. This protocol outlines the design of a non-randomised controlled study aimed at interrupting SB among OW by implementing ABs during working hours. The potential impact of ABs on changes in SB patterns and on physical and psychosocial outcomes will also be assessed. Participants in the study will self-select into an intervention group (IG) or a control group (CG). Both groups will be assessed at baseline (T0) and after 4 months (T1) using accelerometers, ad hoc questionnaires and validated tools. The IG will take part in a 4-month ABs programme, beginning with a counselling session with a kinesiologist. To monitor adherence, compliance, engagement and satisfaction, participants in the IG will complete daily surveys during the first and last 2 weeks of the intervention, keep a daily adherence diary throughout the study and complete a final ad hoc questionnaire to assess satisfaction with the ABs programme. Approval for this study was obtained from the Bioethical Committee of the University of Bologna. The findings could provide an important contribution to the scientific evidence supporting ABs interventions, highlighting their psychosocial and physical benefits in workplace settings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.