ArticleProtein science : a publication of the Protein Society2026
Understanding cell-penetrating peptide mechanisms using computational electrophysiology simulations.
Article in Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Understanding cell-penetrating peptide mechanisms using computational electrophysiology simulations.Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society · 2026Article
- Advances in molecular dynamics approaches for investigating cell-penetrating peptides.Biophysical reviews · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Cell-penetrating peptides (CPPs) can enter cells without inducing cytotoxicity and can be coupled with cargo molecules to be used to deliver drugs, DNA, or nanoparticles into cells. The peptide-membrane interactions driving the internalization mechanism are not completely understood. In this study, we introduce Computational Electrophysiology (CompEL) as a tool for the computational investigation of CPP and membrane interaction leading to internalization, focusing on cationic CPPs such as Arg9, MAP, TP10, and TP2. CompEL induces membrane stress through ion imbalance, prompting the membrane to alleviate this stress via pore formation. Using double bilayer molecular dynamics (MD) simulations with one or eight peptides, we show that CPPs can use these pores to translocate, whereas non-CPP nonaleucine peptide fails to cross the membrane and instead contributes to pore stabilization. In the eight-peptide systems we observe that some peptides can cooperate to reach translocation or to foster pore stabilization. This study introduces CompEL as a powerful tool for CPP research, shedding light into the molecular peptide-membrane interactions governing CPP translocation, and offering valuable insights for the design of next-generation delivery systems.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.