ArticleCNS neuroscience & therapeutics2026
Transcriptomic Insights Into Alzheimer's Disease: Differentially Expressed Genes and Cholesterol Metabolism.
Article in CNS neuroscience & therapeutics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- DHCR24Oncogene · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundAlzheimer's disease (AD) is a progressive neurodegenerative disorder characterized by cognitive decline and memory impairment, posing significant challenges to affected individuals, their families, and healthcare systems globally. With projections indicating that the prevalence of AD could escalate to 152 million cases by 2050, there is an urgent need to elucidate the underlying mechanisms driving this condition. Additionally, developing effective diagnostic tools to aid in its early detection and management is crucial.
methodsIn this study, we utilized a combination of Mendelian randomization and advanced machine learning techniques to analyze transcriptomic data from five distinct cohorts of Alzheimer's Disease (AD) patients. After addressing batch effects, we identified differentially expressed genes (DEGs) between the AD and control groups. Mendelian randomization analysis was conducted to assess the causal relationships between DEGs and AD risk. A Venn diagram was subsequently used to identify genes associated with cholesterol metabolism from the screened gene set. The shared DEGs were subjected to functional enrichment analyses. Furthermore, immune analysis was quantified using Gene Set Enrichment Analysis (GSEA). A diagnostic model for AD was developed by evaluating 113 combinations of 12 machine learning algorithms with 10-fold cross-validation on the training datasets, followed by external validation on test datasets. Finally, immunofluorescence staining was performed on mouse brain slices to verify the expression level of KLHL21.
resultsOur analyses identified a substantial number of differentially expressed genes (DEGs) demonstrating significant differences between Alzheimer's disease (AD) patients and control groups. Among these, we identified 29 genes associated with AD, with 21 of them linked to cholesterol metabolism, highlighting its pivotal role in the disease's pathogenesis. From this set, we developed a robust 8-gene diagnostic signature (comprising CHSY1, FIBP, DHCR24, HVCN1, KIFAP3, KLHL21, LETMD1, and SLC25A29), which outperformed existing AD diagnostic models in both training and testing cohorts. Additionally, complementary animal experiments were conducted to validate the biological relevance of these genes, further elucidating their roles in AD pathology.
conclusionsOur research identified critical genes and proposed novel pathways for early diagnosis and potential therapeutic interventions, paving the way for enhanced clinical applications in Alzheimer's disease management.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.