ArticleClinical psychology & psychotherapy
The Mentalisation Switch: Therapist Reflective Capacity and Alliance Dynamics in Digital MCT+ for Bipolar Disorder-A Longitudinal Quantitative Case Series.
Article in Clinical psychology & psychotherapy. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveThis study conducted a preliminary naturalistic effectiveness evaluation of Individualised Metacognitive Therapy (MCT+) delivered via videoconferencing for individuals with bipolar I disorder (BD-I) in a real-world clinical setting in Chile. It also explored how therapist characteristics-specifically mentalisation capacity-influence the therapeutic alliance in digital psychotherapy.
methodsA longitudinal quantitative case series design was implemented across 14 therapist-patient dyads. Patients received 12 weekly sessions of MCT+ online. Standardised measures assessed anxiety (GAD-7), depression (PHQ-9), metacognitive beliefs (MCQ-30), psychological distress (CORE-10) and quality of life (WHOQOL-BREF). Therapeutic alliance was tracked session-by-session (WAI-S). Therapist mentalisation and attachment were evaluated at baseline (MASC-SP, RFQ-8, ECR-12). Changes in outcome measures were analysed using paired t-tests, effect sizes (Cohen's d), correlations, reliable change indices (RCI) and hierarchical linear modelling (HLM).
resultsAcross the intervention, there were significant decreases in anxiety (d = 0.64) and improvements in metacognitive beliefs (d = 0.37). Depression showed a modest improvement (d = 0.34), while changes in quality of life were negligible (d = -0.21). Hierarchical modelling indicated a significant interaction between automatic and controlled mentalisation (b = -0.45, p = 0.008), suggesting that flexible adjustment supported therapeutic alliance development. Attachment style showed no significant associations with the alliance (largest unadjusted effect: ρ = -0.54, p = 0.073; all adjusted ps > 0.99).
conclusionsDigital MCT+ showed preliminary effectiveness in reducing anxiety and maladaptive metacognitive beliefs among individuals with BD-I, with more limited effects on depression and quality of life. Importantly, therapist mentalisation flexibility-the capacity to shift between automatic and controlled modes, or the mentalisation switch-emerged as a central mechanism for alliance building and engagement in digital contexts, highlighting a key target for clinical training and future research.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.