Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41854724›Full record

ArticlePsychopharmacology2026

D[His

Arax Tanelian, Bistra Nankova, Moshe Weiss, Esther L Sabban

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Psychopharmacology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Arax TanelianNew York Medical College, Valhalla, NY, 10595, USA.
Bistra NankovaNew York Medical College, Valhalla, NY, 10595, USA.
Moshe WeissNew York Medical College, Valhalla, NY, 10595, USA.
Esther L SabbanNew York Medical College, Valhalla, NY, 10595, USA. Esther_Sabban@nymc.edu.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Neuropeptide Y (NPY) has emerged as a key modulator of stress resilience, primarily through activation of the Y1 receptor (Y1R). We previously demonstrated that intranasal delivery of the Y1R-selective analog D[His26]NPY at the time of trauma induced by Single Prolonged Stress (SPS), a validated rodent model for post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD), effectively prevented stress-induced behavioral impairments in male rats. D[His26]NPY was more effective than either intranasal administration of native NPY or the Y1R agonist [Leu31Pro34]NPY. In females, who are more susceptible to stress-related anxiety disorders and PTSD, native NPY has shown limited efficacy. Here, we investigated: (1) efficacy of intranasal D[His26]NPY in female rats; (2) time-dependence of intranasal administration of D[His26]NPY effectiveness for males, in preventing or reversing behavioral impairments. Our results revealed that in female rats, D[His26]NPY produced robust anxiolytic effects at lower doses than native NPY. In male rats, intranasal D[His26]NPY administered at the time of trauma, or 1 day before, averted the development of SPS-induced anxiety and social interaction deficits. Even when given two days prior to the traumatic stress intranasal D[His26]NPY was partiallly effective. However, in contrast to native NPY, D[His26]NPY failed to reverse the established behavioral impairments, when administered two weeks after SPS. These findings suggest that despite sex-specific differences, nose to brain delivery of the Y1R agonist D[His26]NPY could be especially useful as a prophylactic treatment to prevent long-term adverse harmful effects of traumatic stress in both males and females.

Indexed as

AnxietyIntranasalNeuropeptide YNose to brainNPY receptor 1ProphylaxisPTSD modelSex differencesSingle prolonged stressSocial interaction

Identifiers

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.