ReviewDrugs & aging2026
Managing Bone Fragility in Older Adults with Diabetes: Pathophysiology, Assessment, and Therapeutic Considerations.
Review in Drugs & aging, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Unravelling the Impact of Diabetes on Insulin-like Growth Factor (IGF) Axis Signalling in Mesenchymal Stem Cells Isolated from the Bone of Knee Joints.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Muscle and Bone Implications of GLP-1 Receptor Agonists and Fragility Fractures in Older Adults With Diabetes.Journal of cachexia, sarcopenia and muscle · 2026Article
- Development and validation of a nomogram incorporating triglyceride-glucose index and aggregate index of systemic inflammation for assessing osteoporosis risk in type 2 diabetes mellitus: a dual-center retrospective study.Frontiers in endocrinology · 2026Observational
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Older adults with diabetes mellitus, encompassing both type 1 diabetes (T1D) and type 2 diabetes (T2D), face a substantially elevated risk of fragility fractures, contributing significantly to morbidity and mortality in this vulnerable population. The underlying pathophysiology differs between the two types: T1D is typically characterized by reduced bone mineral density (BMD) stemming from insulinopenia, whereas T2D often presents with normal or even high BMD but compromised bone quality due to factors, including altered microarchitecture, accumulation of advanced glycation end products (AGEs), and low bone turnover. These distinct mechanisms create challenges for accurate fracture risk assessment, as standard tools such as dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA)-measured BMD and the Fracture Risk Assessment Tool (FRAX) often underestimate the true risk, particularly in T2D. Effective management necessitates a comprehensive, individualized approach. This includes optimizing glycemic control while minimizing hypoglycemia, implementing lifestyle modifications such as adequate nutrition (calcium, vitamin D, protein) and appropriate exercise, and crucially, proactive fall prevention strategies. Careful consideration must be given to the selection of antidiabetic medications, avoiding agents known to harm bone (e.g., thiazolidinediones) and preferring those with neutral or potentially beneficial skeletal effects (e.g., metformin, dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitors [DPP-4i], glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists [GLP-1 RAs]). Osteoporosis pharmacotherapies, including antiresorptive (bisphosphonates, denosumab) and anabolic agents (teriparatide, abaloparatide, romosozumab), appear effective in patients with diabetes largely on the basis of post hoc analyses and observational data, although evidence specific to this population remains limited. Integrating geriatric principles, such as assessing frailty and polypharmacy, is essential for optimizing care and improving outcomes for older adults with diabetes and bone fragility.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.