Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41855200›Full record

Observational studyPloS one2026

"It makes me feel so much safer": Sexual and gender minority community perspectives on telehealth use and implications for future practice.

Jeffrey A Wilhite, Lisa Altshuler, Alexa B D'Angelo, Anna Raykov, Annabelle Abbadessa, Maryam Roosta, Karmen S Williams, Christian Grov

Abstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Jeffrey A WilhiteDivision of General Internal Medicine and Clinical Innovation, Department of Medicine, NYU Grossman School of Medicine, New York, New York, United States of America.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4096-8473
Lisa AltshulerDivision of General Internal Medicine and Clinical Innovation, Department of Medicine, NYU Grossman School of Medicine, New York, New York, United States of America.
Alexa B D'AngeloCity University of New York Graduate School of Public Health and Health Policy, New York, New York, United States of America.
Anna RaykovCity University of New York Graduate School of Public Health and Health Policy, New York, New York, United States of America.
Annabelle AbbadessaCity University of New York Graduate School of Public Health and Health Policy, New York, New York, United States of America.
Maryam RoostaCity University of New York Graduate School of Public Health and Health Policy, New York, New York, United States of America.
Karmen S WilliamsCity University of New York Graduate School of Public Health and Health Policy, New York, New York, United States of America.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6545-8299
Christian GrovCity University of New York Graduate School of Public Health and Health Policy, New York, New York, United States of America.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionTelehealth has the potential to expand access to care, though barriers including insurance coverage, technology literacy, and personal preferences have been described since the pandemic induced uptick. Sexual and gender minoritized individuals (SGMs) face unique challenges which make telehealth a particularly promising care option. Regardless of population needs, research efforts looking at experiences and opportunities following multiple years of use are missing from the literature. Given that telehealth is here to stay, this study explores telehealth experiences, barriers, and preferences of SGM individuals 4 + years after rapid uptick to inform future efforts for the community.

methodsParticipants were recruited from an observational cohort study of SGM individuals. Eligible participants consented to follow-up contact and had previously used telehealth. Semi-structured interviews (N = 21) were conducted between March and April of 2024, covering telehealth use, barriers, and future directions. Interviews were recorded, transcribed, and thematically analyzed using a directed content analysis approach informed by prior literature. Coding was completed iteratively by four authors, with themes refined through group consensus, resulting in final recommendations for improving telehealth practice and engagement among SGM populations.

resultsThe majority of participants were White (52%), cisgender men (90%) with at least some college education (90%), employed full-time (73%), and residing in the southern U.S (57%). Participants highlighted telehealth's benefits, including provider accessibility, convenience, and comfort discussing sexual health needs with affirming clinicians. They found telehealth particularly useful for medication management, mental health, and sexual health services. They also emphasized the importance of promoting telehealth as providing privacy, security, and culturally competent care, findings which underscore their utilization motivators and shed light on unique needs of the population. Participants recommended improvement opportunities, such as creating/expanding directories of LGBTQ + -friendly providers and increasing/tailoring community-targeted marketing through social media and physical spaces. DISCUSSION AND

conclusionWe interviewed a diverse group of SGM-identifying telehealth users to explore their experiences with telehealth-based care. Participants expressed ongoing interest in telehealth overall, but conversations highlighted future opportunities and provided clear next steps for research, practice, and marketing. Our findings provide valuable insight for the next era of telehealth use.

Indexed as

Sexual and Gender MinoritiesTelemedicineAdultDigital HealthFemaleHealth Services AccessibilityHumansMaleMiddle Aged

Identifiers

PMID41855200
PMCPMC13001967

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.