ArticleJACC. Advances2026
Sex Differences in Cardiovascular Disease Outcomes After Traumatic Brain Injury.
Article in JACC. Advances, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundWe previously demonstrated that traumatic brain injury (TBI) is associated with an increased risk of cardiovascular disease (CVD) in a large cohort of post-9/11 service members and veterans.
objectivesAs emerging evidence indicates that men and women have different outcomes after TBI, we sought to describe CVD risk after TBI stratified by sex.
methodsData were obtained from the Long-term Impact of Military-Relevant Brain Injury Consortium-Chronic Effects of Neurotrauma Consortium Phenotype study. The cohort was divided into 2 subgroups: men and women. The primary outcome of interest was CVD defined as a composite of coronary artery disease, stroke, peripheral artery disease, and CVD mortality defined by International Classification of Diseases diagnosis codes. We performed Fine-Gray competing risks analyses to determine the association of TBI severity with subsequent CVD.
resultsThe study cohort consisted of N = 1,277,430 men and N = 282,498 women, with TBI prevalence of 20.8% and 12.7%, respectively. Men had a higher prevalence of CVD risk factors, and CVD was more prevalent in men (3.1%) compared to women (1.9%) (P < 0.001). In fully adjusted models, HRs and 95% CIs for CVD risk were higher in women than in men for all levels of TBI: HR for mild TBI in women: 2.09 (2.02-2.16) vs men: 1.62 (1.60-1.64); HR for moderate/severe TBI in women: 3.45 (3.34-3.56) vs men: 2.65 (2.62-2.69); HR for penetrating TBI among women: 5.61 (5.44-5.78) vs men 4.22 (4.17-4.27).
conclusionsWe found that while CVD is less common in women, TBI is associated with a larger risk for subsequent CVD in women. Future work is needed to determine the etiology of this association to improve long-term care given the increase in female service members in combat.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.