ReviewJournal of psychiatric research2026
Neurofeedback interventions for obsessive-compulsive and related disorders: Current evidence and future directions.
Review in Journal of psychiatric research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Obsessive-compulsive and related disorders (OCRDs) are characterized by obsessions, compulsive or repetitive behaviors, hoarding and saving, or recurrent body-focused repetitive behaviors. Although pharmacological, cognitive-behavioral, or behavioral therapies provide relief for many for these conditions, a substantial proportion respond insufficiently or experience relapses. Neurofeedback (NF) enables individuals to self-modulate neural activity in real time and has been explored as a non-invasive neuromodulation strategy in obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD), the only OCRD in which NF has been empirically tested to date. Conventional electroencephalogram-based (EEG-NF) and functional magnetic resonance imaging-based (fMRI-NF) protocols have demonstrated that patients can learn to regulate oscillatory activity or region-specific blood-oxygen-level-dependent signals, with some studies reporting symptom improvements. However, heterogeneity in targets, limited personalization, and modest clinical effects constrain conclusions regarding efficacy and scalability. This narrative review synthesizes the existing empirical evidence of NF studies to-date. In addition, it highlights the potential for decoded neurofeedback (DecNef) as a next-generation NF method. Unlike conventional NF, DecNef leverages multivoxel pattern analysis to reinforce distributed neural representations, in some cases without explicit awareness or symptom exposure, and may allow greater precision and personalization of circuit-level interventions. We discuss how DecNef can address limitations of traditional NF and outline its potential translational applications across the OCRD spectrum. By integrating current empirical findings with a forward-looking precision psychiatry framework, this review offers ideas for conceptual and methodological advances for targeting dysfunctional neural systems underlying OCRDs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.