SynthesisDrug and alcohol dependence2026
The wake of addiction: Pharmacological strategies for sleep disturbances in stimulant use disorders, a systematic review.
Synthesis in Drug and alcohol dependence, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundA systematic review was conducted following PRISMA guidelines to identify human studies investigating pharmacological interventions and reported sleep outcomes among individuals with CUD or MUD.
methodsPubMed and APA PsycInfo were searched from inception to January 2025 and risk of bias was assessed. Articles were included if they included human participants with either cocaine or methamphetamine dependence, administered a pharmacological treatment, and reported night-time sleep as an outcome using at least one rigorous measurement tool. Articles were excluded if they included animals, did not include pharmacological intervention (e.g., supplements or behavioral treatments), or only assessed baseline sleep or if sleep was only reported as a side effect rather than as a formal outcome.
resultsEighteen studies (N = 678) met inclusion criteria, eleven in CUD and seven in MUD. The results of the risk-of-bias assessment indicated good-to-excellent interrater reliability (ICC range=0.85-0.90), and overall methodological quality across studies was moderate to high. For CUD, modafinil, buprenorphine, and suvorexant were preliminarily associated with improvements in sleep parameters, with modafinil linked to higher abstinence rates. Results for mirtazapine, lisuride, lorazepam, tiagabine, and cannabidiol were mixed. For MUD, mirtazapine and modafinil demonstrated modest initial benefits, while quetiapine and suvorexant showed preliminary promise in smaller studies.
conclusionsOverall, pharmacological interventions targeting sleep disturbances showed emerging but inconsistent benefits in CUD and MUD, which could be due to small sample sizes, short treatment durations, side effects, or comorbidities. Addressing sleep dysregulation may represent a novel and clinically meaningful pathway to improve recovery outcomes in stimulant use disorders.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.