Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41856084›Full record

ArticleAnimal bioscience2026

Effect of cranberry bean powder and protein isolates with different drying methods on rheological properties of chicken breast myofibrillar protein gels.

Muhammad Rifqi Ananta, Koo Bok Chin

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Animal bioscience, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Muhammad Rifqi AnantaDepartment of Animal Science, Chonnam National University, Gwangju, Korea.
Koo Bok ChinDepartment of Animal Science, Chonnam National University, Gwangju, Korea. kbchin@chonnam.ac.kr.

Funding

Ministry of Science, ICT and Future Planning RS-2023-00276430National Research Foundation of Korea
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThis study aimed to assess the interaction between chicken myofibrillar protein and cranberry bean powder (CBP) processed through different drying methods, including oven-drying (OD) and freeze-drying (FD), along with cranberry bean protein isolates (CBPI), on the rheological properties of chicken myofibrillar protein gels (MPGs).

methodsTwo experiments were done in this study. The isolated MPG treated with various levels of CBP in different drying methods was prepared for the first experiment. The MPG with CBP and CBPI with different drying methods was prepared and compared to soy protein isolate (SPI) in the second experiment. The cooking yield (CY), gel strength (GS), viscosity, sodium dodecyl sulfate-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (SDS-PAGE), and microstructure were measured in both experiments.

resultsThe results showed that freeze-drying isolate (FDI) exhibited the best GS, CY, and viscosity, all of which were comparable to those of SPI. FDI demonstrated superior protein-protein interactions, as evidenced by SDS-PAGE and scanning electron microscopy analyses of well-formed structures. FD performed better than OD in terms of GS and viscosity but still lower than FDI. OD samples, which contained higher levels of carbohydrates and starch, displayed lower GS and less stable gel networks, indicating that starch may interfere with protein matrix formation.

conclusionThe addition of FDI or SPI was shown to be the most effective in enhancing the rheological properties of MPGs, and the higher levels of powder addition also improved viscosity, GS, and CY.

Indexed as

Cranberry BeanDrying MethodsMyofibrillar ProteinProtein IsolateProtein StructureRheological Properties

Identifiers

PMID41856084
PMCPMC13243940

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.