ArticleScientific reports2026
A potential of serum anti-C1P IgG antibodies as biomarkers in differential diagnosis of relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
- Update of
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
There is a growing interest in the role of sphingolipids in the background of multiple sclerosis (MS). The goal of this study was to evaluate the serum levels of antibodies against ceramide-1-phosphate (C1P) subclasses and their relationships with clinical status in MS. The study groups comprised 39 patients with relapsing-remitting MS (RRMS), 26 patients with other neurological diseases (OND) and 12 healthy subjects (HS). Anti-C1P IgG levels in serum were determined using ELISA test. Levels of anti-C18:0-C1P and anti-C24:1-C1P IgG were significantly increased (p = 0.003; p < 0.0001, respectively) in RRMS compared to HS, while anti-C16:0-C1P and anti-C24:0-C1P IgG – significantly lower p < 0.0001 in RRMS compared to OND, with large effect size (r ≥ 0.5) in all above cases. In both settings the acceptable discriminatory performance for RRMS subtype from HS (AUC = 78.1%, 95% CI 66.1–90.4 and AUC = 76.9%, 95% CI 60.3–93.6, respectively) as well as from OND (AUC = 79.8%, 95% CI 68.2–91.4 and AUC = 94.2%, 95% CI 88.6–99.8, accordingly) by receiver operating curve (ROC) was shown. Validation of ROC by cluster analysis confirmed the ability of these anti-C1P IgG panels to discriminate between the study groups. No relationships were found between levels of antibodies in the anti-C1P IgG panel in RRMS group and disease duration, degree of disability or Link index. These findings highlight the relevant role of C1P as a target and/or mediator of autoimmune response in MS and potential value of anti-C1P antibodies as biomarkers in differential diagnosis of this disease.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.