ReviewNature reviews. Molecular cell biology2026
Technologies to measure and modulate protein subcellular localization.
Review in Nature reviews. Molecular cell biology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Subcellular localization as a driver of protein function.Nature reviews. Molecular cell biology · 2026Review
- A Simplified Wheat Protoplast Transformation System and Guideline for Avoiding Protein Localization Artifacts.Plants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Generative machine learning unlocks the first proteome-wide image of human cells.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
How proteins localize to specific compartments, function in coordination with other biomolecules and, ultimately, contribute to diverse cellular activities are crucial questions in cell biology. Complicating the answers to these questions are multilocalizing and multifunctional proteins, whose impact on the cell depends on both spatial and temporal contexts. Therefore, contextualizing protein functions based on their subcellular localization is necessary to fully understand cell behaviours. Recent advances in instrumentation and protein labelling techniques are rapidly increasing the availability of tools, technologies and applications that measure and control protein localization and compartment-specific function. In this Review, we first discuss microscopy, mass spectrometry-based correlation profiling and proximity labelling methods that assign localizations to proteins, ranging from cellular compartments to protein-protein interactions. We next examine the available tools for manipulating protein localization and measuring the effects of these manipulations, including localization tags and bifunctional molecules. For each technology, we assess the strengths and weaknesses that ultimately determine their usefulness. We conclude with an outlook on future technological advances in the field of spatial subcellular proteomics and their potential implications for cell biology and clinical applications.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.