Trial reportScientific reports2026
An eight-week placebo-controlled RCT on the efficacy of a probiotic nutritional intervention for subclinical gastrointestinal symptoms in students.
Trial report in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Despite evidence for substantial placebo effects in the treatment of gastrointestinal (GI) complaints, there is still no methodologically sound study on placebo effects in their probiotic treatment. This randomized controlled trial (RCT) aimed to determine the contribution of a placebo effect in probiotic fruit bit intake in a sample of individuals with mild to moderate gastrointestinal complaints. A sample of 83 individuals were randomly assigned to a probiotic, placebo or to a no-intervention group. All participants received the same information, and the intervention groups took the respective fruit bits daily for eight weeks. Before and after the intervention gastrointestinal symptoms and burden were assessed. Participants in the probiotic (d = -1.08) and placebo group (d = -1.17) benefitted significantly more compared to the no-intervention group with respect of gastrointestinal symptoms, but no significant difference was seen between the probiotic and the placebo group (d = 0.04). At the end of the intervention phase, no significant group differences regarding stress, somatization, and well-being were noted. In both intervention groups, self-reported treatment expectation was not correlated with symptom improvement. Interestingly, in the probiotic group only, subjectively perceived improvement correlated significantly with the change in GI symptoms. While individuals benefitted from a novel probiotic food supplement, data indicated a substantial placebo response. Explicit treatment expectation seems to play a minor role in accounting for the observed intervention effects, yet might contribute to continued use of probiotics.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.