Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41857208›Full record

Trial reportScientific reports2026

An eight-week placebo-controlled RCT on the efficacy of a probiotic nutritional intervention for subclinical gastrointestinal symptoms in students.

Alexander Winkler, Christiane Hermann, Alannah Hahn, Daniel Beis

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Alexander WinklerDepartment of Clinical Psychology and Psychotherapy, Justus-Liebig-University, Otto-Behaghel-Str. 10F, 35394, Giessen, Germany. Alexander.Winkler@psychol.uni-giessen.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4625-6314
Christiane HermannDepartment of Clinical Psychology and Psychotherapy, Justus-Liebig-University, Otto-Behaghel-Str. 10F, 35394, Giessen, Germany.
Alannah HahnDepartment of Clinical Psychology and Psychotherapy, Justus-Liebig-University, Otto-Behaghel-Str. 10F, 35394, Giessen, Germany.
Daniel BeisDepartment of Agricultural Sciences, Nutritional Sciences, and Environmental Management, Institute of Nutrition Sciences, Justus-Liebig-University, Giessen, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Despite evidence for substantial placebo effects in the treatment of gastrointestinal (GI) complaints, there is still no methodologically sound study on placebo effects in their probiotic treatment. This randomized controlled trial (RCT) aimed to determine the contribution of a placebo effect in probiotic fruit bit intake in a sample of individuals with mild to moderate gastrointestinal complaints. A sample of 83 individuals were randomly assigned to a probiotic, placebo or to a no-intervention group. All participants received the same information, and the intervention groups took the respective fruit bits daily for eight weeks. Before and after the intervention gastrointestinal symptoms and burden were assessed. Participants in the probiotic (d = -1.08) and placebo group (d = -1.17) benefitted significantly more compared to the no-intervention group with respect of gastrointestinal symptoms, but no significant difference was seen between the probiotic and the placebo group (d = 0.04). At the end of the intervention phase, no significant group differences regarding stress, somatization, and well-being were noted. In both intervention groups, self-reported treatment expectation was not correlated with symptom improvement. Interestingly, in the probiotic group only, subjectively perceived improvement correlated significantly with the change in GI symptoms. While individuals benefitted from a novel probiotic food supplement, data indicated a substantial placebo response. Explicit treatment expectation seems to play a minor role in accounting for the observed intervention effects, yet might contribute to continued use of probiotics.

Indexed as

Gastrointestinal DiseasesProbioticsAdultFemaleHumansMalePlacebo EffectStudentsTreatment OutcomeYoung AdultGastrointestinalPlaceboProbioticsStressTreatment

Identifiers

PMID41857208
PMCPMC13004927

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.