ArticleAnalytical and bioanalytical chemistry2026
Optimization of trap column properties and loading conditions for proteome profiling of single-cell-level sample inputs.
Article in Analytical and bioanalytical chemistry, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Nanoflow liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry has become indispensable for profiling limited and heterogeneous biological samples, yet overall analytical sensitivity, robustness, and throughput often remain constrained by the mechanisms used to transfer samples onto the analytical column. Although trap-and-elute workflows are widely deployed to improve loading efficiency, sample cleanup, and column longevity, a systematic evaluation of how trap column properties and loading parameters influence proteome coverage, particularly under low-input and high-throughput conditions, is needed. Here, we assess trap column inner diameter, particle size, packing material, loading flow rate, and sample concentration using both bulk-prepared digests and single cells. We demonstrate that incorporating a trap column markedly mitigates performance losses associated with large-volume loading with minimal impact on peak width, peak area, or identification depth. Notably, variations in trap column geometry and loading speed exert only minimal influence on chromatographic quality or proteome depth, indicating that trap-and-elute workflows afford considerable flexibility in the LC system design. These findings establish practical guidelines for optimizing trap column configurations and highlight the suitability of trap-and-elute strategies for high-sensitivity, high-throughput proteomics.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.