ArticleScientific reports2026
A retrospective clinical risk prediction model for co‑infection with Mycoplasma pneumoniae in patients with COVID‑19 based on restricted cubic splines.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Co-infection with Mycoplasma pneumoniae (MP) represents a clinically significant complication that often leads to prolonged hospital stay, increased mortality risk, and a higher demand for mechanical ventilation. This study constructed a risk prediction model for early identification of SARS-CoV-2 and MP co-infections. We retrospectively analyzed SARS-CoV-2 patients admitted between December 2022 and February 2023. Patients were stratified into co-infection and mono-infection groups based on MP antibody results. LASSO regression screened 55 variables, followed by multicollinearity checks. Restricted cubic splines (RCS) analyzed nonlinear relationships between continuous variables and infection risk. Conventional logistic and integrated RCS-logistic models were constructed and compared. LASSO identified seven predictors: age, globulin, anion gap, blood urea nitrogen (BUN), uric acid, prothrombin time (PT), and thrombin time (TT). Multivariate analysis showed globulin, anion gap, uric acid, and TT were independent risk factors, whereas BUN was protective. RCS revealed significant nonlinear associations between globulin, PT, and TT levels. The RCS-logistic model outperformed the conventional linear model, with a higher AUC of 0.827, better calibration (Brier score = 0.169), and greater net clinical benefit on decision curve analysis. This model enables early risk assessment and optimizes treatment, offering a methodological reference for predicting co-infections with emerging respiratory pathogens.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.