ReviewDiscover oncology2026
Artificial intelligence for precision oncology from phenotyping and drug discovery to clinical translation.
Review in Discover oncology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Artificial intelligence (AI) is reshaping oncology by extracting clinically actionable signals from complex cancer data and accelerating drug development. In this narrative review, we summarize how machine learning and deep learning models support cancer phenotyping, including tumor detection, molecular subtyping, prognosis, and treatment response prediction across histopathology, radiology, and multi-omics data. We then discuss AI-enabled virtual screening, drug repurposing, generative molecular design, and hybrid computational–experimental pipelines that streamline oncology drug discovery and optimization. Cross-cutting limitations are examined, including data quality and representativeness, class imbalance, bias and fairness, model interpretability, and ethical, privacy, and regulatory challenges in clinical deployment. Finally, we highlight emerging directions such as multimodal foundation models, federated learning, AI stewardship, and patient-specific digital twins, and outline a roadmap for integrating trustworthy AI into precision oncology. Realizing the full potential of AI will require rigorous validation, transparent reporting, and close collaboration between clinicians, data scientists, regulators, and patients to ensure equitable, patient-centred benefit.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.