ReviewJournal of the Chinese Medical Association : JCMA2026
Ocular complications from glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists: Clinical evidence, potential mechanisms, and clinical recommendations.
Review in Journal of the Chinese Medical Association : JCMA, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1 RAs)-central to type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) management owing to their comprehensive benefits (glycemic control, weight reduction, cardiovascular benefits, and renal protection)-exhibit a concerning ocular safety profile. Clinical trial data, notably from SUSTAIN-6, revealed a higher incidence of diabetic retinopathy (DR) complications with semaglutide, particularly in patients with preexisting DR and rapid HbA1c reduction, reflecting early worsening. Conversely, the REWIND and LEADER trials reported no significant increase in DR risk, suggesting variability among agents and the potential influence of glycemic trajectory. Observational studies and meta-analyses provide mixed findings: some suggest increased DR progression risk in vulnerable populations, while others indicate a lower risk than insulin therapy. Beyond DR, recent pharmacoepidemiologic studies and pharmacovigilance reports have implicated GLP-1 RAs-especially semaglutide-in nonarteritic anterior ischemic optic neuropathy (NAION), leading the European Medicines Agency to classify NAION as a very rare adverse effect and prompting regulatory scrutiny. Conversely, real-world data suggest possible protective associations with other retinal disorders, including reduced incidence of neovascular age-related macular degeneration and diabetic macular edema, although findings remain inconsistent. The mechanistic pathways involve rapid metabolic shifts, vascular dysregulation, and potentially direct effects on retinal or optic nerve tissue. While GLP-1 RAs confer substantial systemic benefits, their ocular risks appear concentrated in high-risk subgroups. Individualized prescribing, baseline ophthalmic assessment, and interdisciplinary monitoring are essential until ongoing prospective trials clarify their long-term ocular impact.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.