ArticleAnimal microbiome2026
Characterising the gut microbiome of six Australian marsupials reveals captivity constrains microbiome.
Article in Animal microbiome, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe gut microbiome is an ecosystem of microbes that live within the host’s digestive tract and are a vital component of host health. An increasing number of studies are investigating microbiome differences in wild and captive-managed populations to assist in species conservation and improve captive welfare. The gut microbiota of Australian marsupials has not been extensively studied but has long been recognised as having an important functional role in the digestive physiology and health of those in care. We used 16S rRNA gene sequencing to characterise and compare the faecal bacterial communities of six species of Australian marsupials from captive or wild origins over a large temporal and spatial scale.
resultsWe found the microbiome of captive marsupials had reduced microbial richness and diversity in two species, the brushtail possum and the Eastern grey kangaroo. Captivity was associated with gut microbiome compositional differences for half of the species tested. These compositional changes were accompanied by less pronounced seasonal variability in captivity.
conclusionsThis study provides valuable baseline data and demonstrates that captivity significantly alters the gut microbiota, suppressing its natural seasonal variability. These findings enhance our understanding of the gut microbiome in Australian marsupials. Future research should focus on determining the functional importance of these microbial communities and develop strategies to address any microbiome deficiencies in managed populations. Such efforts could ultimately improve the success of captive rearing and reintroduction programs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.