ArticleInternational journal of mental health nursing2026
Development of a Repeat Suicide Risk Management Protocol for Emergency Department Patients With Suicide Attempts: An Exploratory Sequential Mixed-Methods Study.
Article in International journal of mental health nursing, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Development of a Repeat Suicide Risk Management Protocol for Emergency Department Patients With Suicide Attempts: An Exploratory Sequential Mixed-Methods Study.International journal of mental health nursing · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The emergency department serves as the first point of contact for patients who have attempted suicide, playing a crucial role in identifying and managing their risk of subsequent suicide behaviours. However, evidence-based protocols for managing the repeat suicide risk are currently lacking in Chinese emergency departments. This study aimed to develop a preliminary, evidence-informed protocol for managing repeat suicide risk among emergency department patients who have already attempted suicide. A two-phase exploratory sequential mixed-methods design was employed. Phase 1 involved evidence synthesis and semi-structured interviews to develop a preliminary protocol draft. Phase 2 utilized a two-round Delphi expert consultation to revise and finalize the protocol. In the first phase, three themes were identified: behavioural attitudes toward suicide prevention, subjective norms of significant others and perceived behavioural control among healthcare providers. In the second phase, 19 experts completed two rounds of Delphi consultation. This resulted in a consensus protocol with 4 primary indicators (organiszational support, safety assurance, suicide assessment and intervention measures), 12 secondary indicators and 38 tertiary indicators. The expert panel demonstrated good authority and coordination (Cr = 0.927, Ca = 0.958), achieving a high level of consensus (Kendall's W = 0.292 and 0.385, p < 0.001) across two rounds. The risk management protocol developed in this study is actionable and focused. It provides a valuable reference for future clinical practice and related research in managing repeat suicide risk among such patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.