SynthesisSystematic reviews2026
Exploring the protective effects of thalassemia against malaria in Africa: a systematic review.
Synthesis in Systematic reviews, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
introductionThalassemia, a hereditary blood disorder characterized by abnormal hemoglobin production, is prevalent in malaria-endemic regions, particularly among individuals of African descent. This hemoglobinopathy is believed to confer protection against malaria, reducing the severity of the disease and its associated complications. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the protective effects of thalassemia against malaria, drawing insights from studies conducted in Africa between 2013 and 2025.
methodsThis review adhered to the PRISMA guidelines and has been registered on PROSPERO. A comprehensive literature search was conducted via PubMed, Scopus, Cochrane Library, Embase and Google Scholar, supplemented by manual reference checks. Boolean search terms such as "thalassemia," "malaria," and "Africa" were used. The meta-analysis was conducted via R version 4.4.1, and a random effects model was used to calculate pooled odds ratios (ORs). Heterogeneity was assessed via the I2 statistic, and publication bias was evaluated via funnel plots and Egger's test.
resultsAmong the 4,957 screened articles, 15 studies met the inclusion criteria, with eight providing sufficient data for meta-analysis. The meta-analysis indicated that thalassemic individuals had lower odds (OR: 0.856) of developing malaria than non-thalassemic individuals. Mechanistically, alpha thalassemia has been shown to reduce cytoadhesion and rosette formation and enhance immune clearance, with favorable interactions observed with the haptoglobin phenotype (Hp2-1).
conclusionAlthough the pooled estimate suggested a protective trend, the association was not statistically significant and was characterized by substantial heterogeneity across studies. While these findings underscore the evolutionary link between hemoglobinopathies and malaria resistance, further research is needed to elucidate molecular pathways and broader implications of thalassemia. SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION: PROSPERO CRD420261294712.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.