ArticleBMC psychology2026
Integrating physical, emotional, and social changes to examine their associations with self-efficacy among college students engaging in physical activity.
Article in BMC psychology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionCollege students face increasing physical and psychological challenges, and the multidimensional association between physical activity and well-being warrants clarification. This study tested an integrative model linking physical activity to perceived physical, emotional, and social relationship changes and self-efficacy, and examined variation by sex and training time.
methodsA cross-sectional survey was conducted among 1,082 full-time university students in China (inclusion: basic engagement in physical activity; exclusion: major physical or mental illness). Validated questionnaires were used to assess physical activity, self-efficacy, health status, and well-being, together with study-developed subscales for perceived physical, emotional, and social relationship changes. Internal consistency and construct validity were evaluated in the study sample, and the intended measurement structure was supported. Correlation analyses and structural equation modelling (SPSS/AMOS) examined model-based associations and moderation by sex and training time. This study was approved by the institutional ethics committee, and informed consent was obtained from all participants.
resultsPerceived physical, emotional, and social relationship changes were positively associated with self-efficacy; perceived emotional changes correlated strongly with perceived physical changes (r = 0.843, p < 0.01). In structural equation modelling, perceived emotional changes were positioned between perceived physical changes and downstream social relationship changes and self-efficacy, consistent with an indirect association pattern. Sex differences were observed for social relationship changes and self-efficacy, and training time moderated selected paths.
conclusionPhysical activity–related variables were associated with an interconnected physical–emotional–social pattern linked to self-efficacy, with variation by sex and training time. These findings should be interpreted as model-based associations; longitudinal or experimental studies are needed to establish temporal ordering and causal mechanisms.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.