ArticleJournal of ovarian research2026
Clinical significance of CD27
Article in Journal of ovarian research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveOvarian cancer remains the most lethal gynaecological malignancy, and the identification of reliable biomarkers for determining treatment responses and prognosis is needed. This study investigated the clinical significance of helper and cytotoxic effector memory T-cell (T
methodsMulti-parametric flow cytometry was used to analyse peripheral blood (n = 30), ascites (n = 14) and tumour tissue (n = 31) from patients with high-grade ovarian cancer (FIGO III-C, n = 31) and age-matched healthy controls (n = 16). Subsets were stratified by histopathology, neoadjuvant chemotherapy status, and clinical outcomes.
resultsT
conclusionThe preservation of CD27 and CD28 on circulating T
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.