Trial reportPhysiological reports2026
Breathing technique-dependent acute cardiopulmonary responses during squats in healthy females.
Trial report in Physiological reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Breath-holding (BH), including variations of the Valsalva maneuver, is used during resistance exercise to stabilize the trunk and increase intra-abdominal pressure. However, its hemodynamic and ventilatory effects during low-to-moderate intensity strength training in women remain unclear. In a randomized crossover design, 17 healthy, young females performed squats at three intensities (bodyweight, 25%, and 50% of 10-repetition maximum) under two breathing conditions: BH or controlled breathing (CB) during the concentric phase. Cardiopulmonary responses were assessed using impedance cardiography, spirometry, and auscultatory arterial blood pressure measurement. Across intensities, BH elicited significantly higher heart rate (+2%-5%; p < 0.01), cardiac output (+3%-8%; p = 0.02), systolic blood pressure (+16%-23%; p < 0.01), rate-pressure product (+20%-30%; p < 0.01), and rating of perceived exertion (+14%-19%; p < 0.01) than CB. Oxygen uptake (-11%-15%; p < 0.01) and minute ventilation (-16%-17%; p < 0.01) were significantly reduced during BH, followed by a post-exercise overshoot. Stroke volume and blood lactate did not differ significantly. Even at low-to-moderate intensities, BH during resistance exercise induces moderate cardiovascular strain and transient ventilation reductions. In healthy, young women, these responses remained within a non-critical range, suggesting that short, controlled BH may represent a viable and safe strategy during strength training.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.