ArticleFrontiers in oncology2026
Artificial neural network-based immune biomarker signature predicts pathological complete response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in HER2-negative breast cancer.
Article in Frontiers in oncology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) is widely used in early-stage and locally advanced HER2-negative breast cancer, yet pathological complete response (pCR) is achieved in only a subset of patients. Reliable pretreatment biomarkers for predicting pCR are lacking, particularly for patients treated with standard anthracycline- and taxane-based regimens. Increasing evidence indicates that chemotherapy efficacy is closely linked to the tumor immune microenvironment, suggesting that immune-related molecular signatures may improve response prediction. Methods: A total of 2,385 pretreatment HER2-negative breast cancer patients from ten GEO cohorts were included. GSE194040 (n = 743) was used for training, and nine independent cohorts (n = 1,642) were used for external validation. Differential expression analysis was performed separately in hormone receptor positive and negative subgroups, and genes showing concordant regulation between pCR and non-pCR cases were identified. Weighted gene co-expression network analysis (WGCNA) was applied to detect pCR-associated gene modules. Immune-related genes curated from the ImmPort database were intersected with candidate genes, followed by feature selection using least absolute shrinkage and selection operator regression, random forest, and support vector machine recursive feature elimination. An artificial neural network (ANN) model was constructed based on overlapping features and evaluated using receiver operating characteristic analysis. Immune infiltration was estimated by CIBERSORT, and transcription factor, competing endogenous RNA, and drug enrichment analyses were performed. Key genes were further validated by quantitative real-time PCR in pretreatment tumor tissues. Results: Five immune-related genes (CCL2, CXCL10, CXCL13, HLA-E, and IGKV1D-8) were identified as robust predictors of pCR and used to build the ANN model. The model achieved an area under the curve of 0.858(95% CI: 0.829-0.888) in the training cohort and 0.773 (95% CI: 0.735-0.808) in the external validation cohorts, demonstrating s predictive performance across independent datasets. High expression of the five-gene signature was associated with increased infiltration of cytotoxic and antigen-presenting immune cells, consistent with an immune-activated tumor microenvironment, and was confirmed by qRT-PCR analysis. Conclusion: This study establishes a rigorously validated ANN-based immune gene signature for predicting response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in HER2-negative breast cancer, providing a potential tool for pretreatment risk stratifictableation and individualized therapeutic decision-making.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.