ArticleRisk management and healthcare policy2026
AI-Driven Medical Device Risk Management: A New Paradigm Integrating Large Language Models and Prompt Engineering for Standard-Risk Knowledge Graph Construction and Application.
Article in Risk management and healthcare policy, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Minimum Procedural Volume Thresholds for Surgical Privileging: A Mixed-Methods Validation and Risk Management Framework in a Multi-Specialty Healthcare Network.Risk management and healthcare policy · 2026Article
- Feasibility-First Risk Management for Clinical AI: A Deterministic Systems Intelligence Framework for Release, Monitoring, Rollback and Withholding.Risk management and healthcare policy · 2026Article
- Artificial Intelligence and Enhanced Recovery After Surgery as Patient Safety Strategies for Perioperative Care in Resource-Limited Settings.Risk management and healthcare policy · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: To address the problems in medical electrical equipment risk management caused by the disconnection between unstructured medical electrical equipment standard documents and adverse event data, the lack of high-quality annotated data, and the reliance on manual combing for risk analysis. Methods: This paper proposes a novel method for constructing a risk knowledge graph that integrates large language models and prompting engineering standards. Using adverse event data from early childhood incubators as a case study, it integrates multi-source standards to construct a three-layer risk knowledge system. It designs multi-angle prompting strategies involving entity relationships and employs a dual strategy of entity disambiguation and aggregation to achieve knowledge integration and standardization. Results: The thought chain reasoning suggestion has the best performance (mean F1 score of 0.871). The constructed knowledge graph contains 24,106 nodes and 18,053 relationships, achieving a complete "fault-standard-measure" link. Based on this, a question-answering system for intelligent risk retrieval was developed. Conclusion: This provides a low-cost, reusable knowledge graph construction path for the resource-constrained medical device field, promoting the transformation of risk management towards AI empowerment and assisting in intelligent supervision of adverse events related to medical devices.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.