ReviewFrontiers in psychology2026
Nature connectedness framework for adolescents: an integrative review.
Review in Frontiers in psychology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Connection to nature has been recognized to be critical for health, wellbeing and eco-supportive actions. While measures of children's connection to nature are relatively high, studies indicate a decline during early adolescence. Inconsistencies in existing research on conceptualization and measurement, along with the need to consider the unique experiences and perspectives of younger generations, highlight the need for an improved conceptual framework that guides the development of instruments that assess connection to nature. This article presents an integrative review that synthesized empirical literature from diverse fields to identify key dimensions of nature connectedness: emotional and relational connection, cognitive connection, experiential and sensory engagement, philosophical-ethical-spiritual connection, sustainable practices and stewardship, and psychological and physical wellbeing. An iterative integrative review methodology involving concept mapping and peer review feedback was employed to develop the Integrated Nature Connectedness Framework. The resulting framework is expected to guide the development of age-appropriate instruments for assessing connection to nature. By providing a holistic understanding of human-nature relationships in the context of a rapidly changing, technology-driven world, the Integrated Nature Connectedness Framework aims to inform educational strategies that effectively nurture nature connectedness and sustainable behaviors of adolescents.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.