Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41858505›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in digital health2026

Short-form video platforms as a source of ankylosing spondylitis information: a cross-sectional content analysis.

Xi Wei, Zhenfu Sun, Zilin Zhu, Luoxi Zheng, Donghai Zhou, Muzhi Chen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in digital health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Xi Wei *The Second Clinical Medical College, Zhejiang Chinese Medical University, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China.
Zhenfu Sun *The Fourth Clinical Medical College, Xinjiang Medical University, Urumqi, China.
Zilin ZhuThe Second Clinical Medical College, Zhejiang Chinese Medical University, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China.
Luoxi ZhengThe Second Clinical Medical College, Zhejiang Chinese Medical University, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China.
Donghai ZhouDepartment of Rheumatology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Zhejiang Chinese Medical University, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China.
Muzhi ChenDepartment of Rheumatology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Zhejiang Chinese Medical University, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Short-video platforms have become major channels for health information dissemination, yet the quality and reliability of content on ankylosing spondylitis (AS) remain underexplored. Objective: This study aimed to systematically evaluate the quality, reliability, and characteristics of AS-related short videos on three major Chinese platforms: TikTok, Bilibili, and rednote. Methods: A cross-sectional content analysis was conducted on 300 videos (100 per platform) collected in November 2025. Video uploaders were categorized as professional physicians, non-professional physicians, individual users, or institutions. Four validated instruments-modified DISCERN (mDISCERN), Global Quality Scale (GQS), Journal of the American Medical Association (JAMA) criteria, and Video Information Quality Index (VIQI)-were used to assess reliability, completeness, and production quality. User engagement metrics, including likes, shares, comments, and collections, were also analyzed. Results: Most videos were uploaded by professional physicians and primarily focused on clinical manifestations and treatment. Videos presented in animated or lecture-style formats demonstrated higher information quality and reliability, whereas casually recorded videos consistently scored lower across multiple assessment tools. Overall, the quality of AS-related short videos was moderate. In unadjusted analyses, collections were positively associated with information quality, suggesting that users may preferentially retain more informative content. However, after accounting for platform characteristics and exposure-related factors, information quality was not a consistent independent driver of relative engagement, and mDISCERN showed an inverse association with standardized collection levels. Other engagement indicators, including likes, comments, shares, and follower counts, showed weak or inconsistent relationships with video quality. Conclusion: Although AS-related short videos are predominantly produced by physicians, the overall quality remains suboptimal. Information quality appears to influence certain user behaviors, such as content saving, but does not consistently translate into higher overall engagement. These findings highlight the limitations of using engagement metrics as proxies for content quality. Users should prioritize content from verified medical professionals, and platforms may consider integrating quality-oriented indicators and improving certification systems to enhance health information dissemination.

Indexed as

ankylosing spondylitisChinahealth communicationshort-videosocial mediavideo quality

Identifiers

PMID41858505
PMCPMC12996211

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.