ReviewDiscover artificial intelligence2026
Model centric collaboration reduces data sharing barriers in medical artificial intelligence.
Review in Discover artificial intelligence, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Medical artificial intelligence (AI) offers transformative potential for earlier disease detection, equitable access, and safer, more consistent care. However, its advancement depends on large-scale, multimodal, and longitudinal clinical data, which are highly sensitive and difficult to share under increasingly strict privacy and regulatory constraints. Federated learning-based on local training with gradient or parameter sharing-has emerged as a partial response to these challenges, yet it continues to face important limitations, including reliance on centralized aggregation, communication overhead, and reduced efficiency in heterogeneous settings. This perspective outlines a conceptual framework for rethinking collaboration in medical AI. We introduce the forward-looking notion of a data-model network, a model-centric paradigm that shifts collaboration from direct data exchange toward structured model interaction. In this framework, healthcare institutions train models locally and exchange model artifacts-such as parameters, distilled representations, or weak-to-strong generalizations-within a decentralized ecosystem, without transferring raw patient data. This theoretical model highlights how model-centric interaction can enable collective learning across heterogeneous clinical environments while preserving data sovereignty and embedding privacy protection by design. At the same time, we emphasize that this paradigm entails its own trade-offs and implementation challenges, including governance complexity, knowledge incompleteness, and trust management. By articulating these opportunities and limitations, this perspective argues that privacy-aware collaboration architectures can reposition privacy compliance from a constraint into a potential driver of innovation in medical AI-without presenting it as a panacea.
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.