Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41858508›Full record

ReviewDiscover artificial intelligence2026

Model centric collaboration reduces data sharing barriers in medical artificial intelligence.

Yanan Dai, Yue Cai, Yuchen Xu, Qingqing Cai, Shilong Zhang, Yan Wang, Yunhao Xie, Yuan Liu, Leilei Cheng

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Discover artificial intelligence, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Yanan Dai *Department of Echocardiography,, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai Institute of Cardiovascular Diseases, Shanghai Institute of Medical Imaging, Shanghai, 200032 China.
Yue Cai *The First School of Medicine, School of Information and Engineering, Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou, 325035 China.
Yuchen XuDepartment of Cardiology, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, 200032 China.
Qingqing CaiDepartment of Pharmacy, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, 200032 China.
Shilong ZhangDepartment of Cardiology, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, 200032 China.
Yan WangDepartment of Oncology, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, 200032 China.
Yunhao XieZhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, 200032 China.
Yuan LiuDepartment of Cardiology, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, 200032 China.
Leilei ChengDepartment of Echocardiography,, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai Institute of Cardiovascular Diseases, Shanghai Institute of Medical Imaging, Shanghai, 200032 China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Medical artificial intelligence (AI) offers transformative potential for earlier disease detection, equitable access, and safer, more consistent care. However, its advancement depends on large-scale, multimodal, and longitudinal clinical data, which are highly sensitive and difficult to share under increasingly strict privacy and regulatory constraints. Federated learning-based on local training with gradient or parameter sharing-has emerged as a partial response to these challenges, yet it continues to face important limitations, including reliance on centralized aggregation, communication overhead, and reduced efficiency in heterogeneous settings. This perspective outlines a conceptual framework for rethinking collaboration in medical AI. We introduce the forward-looking notion of a data-model network, a model-centric paradigm that shifts collaboration from direct data exchange toward structured model interaction. In this framework, healthcare institutions train models locally and exchange model artifacts-such as parameters, distilled representations, or weak-to-strong generalizations-within a decentralized ecosystem, without transferring raw patient data. This theoretical model highlights how model-centric interaction can enable collective learning across heterogeneous clinical environments while preserving data sovereignty and embedding privacy protection by design. At the same time, we emphasize that this paradigm entails its own trade-offs and implementation challenges, including governance complexity, knowledge incompleteness, and trust management. By articulating these opportunities and limitations, this perspective argues that privacy-aware collaboration architectures can reposition privacy compliance from a constraint into a potential driver of innovation in medical AI-without presenting it as a panacea.

Identifiers

PMID41858508
PMCPMC12995956

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.