Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41858554›Full record

ReviewRegenerative biomaterials2026

Regenerative medicine approaches for the treatment of peripheral nerve injuries: progress and challenges.

Haochen Yang, Qinwen Bao, Xiaosong Gu, Meng Cong

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Regenerative biomaterials, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Haochen YangSchool of Medicine, Nantong University, Nantong 226001, China.
Qinwen BaoSchool of Medicine, Nantong University, Nantong 226001, China.
Xiaosong GuKey Laboratory of Neuroregeneration of Jiangsu and Ministry of Education, Co-Innovation Center of Neuroregeneration, Nantong University, Nantong 226001, China.
Meng CongKey Laboratory of Neuroregeneration of Jiangsu and Ministry of Education, Co-Innovation Center of Neuroregeneration, Nantong University, Nantong 226001, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7052-4788

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Peripheral nerve injury (PNI), a prevalent clinical disorder induced by trauma, immune diseases and genetic factors, can result in sensory, motor and autonomic dysfunction, with this dysfunction seriously compromising patients' quality of life. Although traditional treatment methods such as autologous nerve transplantation are the gold standard, there are limitations such as insufficient donors, poor repair effect of long segmental defects and low functional recovery rate. Effective repair after nerve injury is still a challenge in neurosurgery. Therefore, new strategies need to be found to treat peripheral nerve injuries. Regenerative medicine has attracted much attention as an effective alternative therapy to promote the repair and regeneration of damaged peripheral nerves. Regenerative medicine provides new ideas for breaking through the bottleneck of traditional treatment by integrating cutting-edge technologies such as cell therapy, tissue engineering and gene therapy. However, current regenerative medicine needs to overcome challenges such as efficacy stability, long-term safety and cost-effectiveness. In this review, we summarize the structure and function of peripheral nerves, the mechanism and classification of injury and the pathological progression of PNI. Importantly, regenerative medicine strategies for the treatment of PNI are emphasized, and the challenges and future development of regenerative medicine are envisioned.

Indexed as

cell and exosomes therapygene therapyperipheral nerve injuryregenerative medicinetissue engineering

Identifiers

PMID41858554
PMCPMC12998714

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.