Evidence mapPaperPMID 41858611Full record

ArticleKDD : proceedings. International Conference on Knowledge Discovery & Data Mining2025

A Survey on Unifying Large Language Models and Knowledge Graphs for Biomedicine and Healthcare.

Ran Xu, Patrick Jiang, Linhao Luo, Cao Xiao, Adam Cross, Shirui Pan, Jimeng Sun, Carl Yang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in KDD : proceedings. International Conference on Knowledge Discovery & Data Mining, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Ran XuDepartment of Computer Science, Emory Universit Atlanta, USA.
Patrick JiangDepartment of Computer Science, UIUC Urbana, USA.
Linhao LuoDepartment of Computer Science, Monash University Melbourne, Australia.
Cao XiaoGE HealthCare Seattle, USA.
Adam CrossDepartment of Pediatrics, UIC Chicago, USA.
Shirui PanSchool of ICT, Griffith University Brisbane, Australia.
Jimeng SunDepartment of Computer Science, UIUC Urbana, USA.
Carl YangDepartment of Computer Science, Emory University Atlanta, USA.

Funding

Understanding Diabetes Heterogeneity via Mining Multimodality Interconnected DataK25DK135913 · EMORY UNIVERSITY · 2025 to 2025
$171k
NIDDK NIH HHS K25 DK135913
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In recent years, the landscape of digital biomedicine and healthcare has been reshaped due to the disruptive breakthroughs in AI-facilitated by tremendous data and high-performance computers, large language models (LLMs) have transformed information technology from accessing data to performing analytical tasks. While demonstrating unprecedented capabilities, LLMs have been found unreliable in tasks requiring factual knowledge and rigorous reasoning. Biomedicine and healthcare, as an important vertical domain rapidly benefitting from progress in AI, necessitates strict requirements on the accuracy, controllability, and interpretability of analytical models, posing critical challenges for LLMs. Despite recent studies addressing the hallucination problem of LLMs, research on empowering LLMs with the ability to plan, reason, and ground with explicit knowledge has also started to prosper, especially in the biomedicine and healthcare domain. On the other hand, biomedical data are enormous and notoriously complex, coming from various sources (

Indexed as

biomedical scienceshealth informaticsknowledge graphlarge language model

Identifiers

PMID41858611
PMCPMC12995553

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.