ArticlePatient preference and adherence2026
Factors Associated with Patient Treatment Satisfaction in Diabetes Mellitus Care Using the DTSQs: A Nationwide Cross-Sectional Study in Saudi Arabia.
Article in Patient preference and adherence, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Culturally Tailored Education Interventions to Enhance Diabetes Self-Management: A Systematic Review of Randomised Controlled Trials.Journal of multidisciplinary healthcare · 2026Review
- Assessment of Patient Satisfaction with TB Care Services in Southern Afghanistan.Patient preference and adherence · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Patient satisfaction is crucial in managing chronic diseases like diabetes mellitus (DM). This study aims to identify the key factors associated with patient satisfaction with DM treatment in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia. Methods: This cross-sectional study collected data from 709 participants country-wide via an online survey. Participants included patients receiving care from public and private healthcare facilities offering primary or specialized diabetes care. Patient satisfaction was assessed using the Diabetes Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire (DTSQs), with chi-square tests for HbA1c control and Mann-Whitney Results: Governmental healthcare patients had higher satisfaction (Mean = 27.32, SD = 7.62) than private (Mean = 25.5, SD = 8.51) ( Conclusion: Mode of healthcare delivery (public or private hospitals) and choice between primary care or diabetes centers was significantly associated with treatment satisfaction with greater satisfaction in governmental healthcare and specialized diabetes centers. Glycemic control, measured by HbA1c, showed no significant association with overall treatment satisfaction but was associated with specific item scores (including satisfaction with understanding and treatment flexibility). This study is among the first in Saudi Arabia to compare DM treatment satisfaction across different healthcare settings using the DTSQs. Recognizing these associations can provide healthcare professionals with valuable insights for more successful treatment of diabetes patients and ultimately improve patient outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.