ArticleOphthalmology science2026
Quantitative Assessment of Fluorescein Angiography Leakage via Deep Learning in Pediatric Uveitis: Correlation with Clinical Parameters.
Article in Ophthalmology science, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: Develop a deep learning algorithm for automated segmentation of retinal vascular and macular edema (ME) leakage in fluorescein angiography (FA) of pediatric uveitis. Design: Model trained on internal FA images with external validation. Participants: One hundred eighty-three pediatric uveitis patients (3144 FA images) at the Eye Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University. External validation used 45 patients (396 FA images) from The First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University and The Affiliated Eye Hospital of Nanjing Medical University. Methods: The model was trained, validated, and applied to 28 independent pediatric cases to correlate leakage area with clinical metrics and determine clinically significant change thresholds. Main Outcome Measures: Segmentation performance (Dice) and pixel-based leakage area for analysis. Results: In fivefold cross-validation on 2459 internal images (155 patients), the best mean Dice scores were 0.7241 (retinal leakage) and 0.7273 (macular leakage). On external data, the best mean Dice reached 0.7015 and 0.5918, respectively. In the cohort of 28 pediatric uveitis patients, vitreous cells (VCs) and central macular thickness (CMT) were the most consistent parameters associated with retinal leakage across multiple analyses. After multiple comparison correction, both VC and CMT remained significantly associated with total and posterior pole leakage areas at all time points. For ME leakage, CMT and best-corrected visual acuity showed consistent associations, while VC was significant only at follow-up, whereas other examined variables showed no consistent association after correction for multiple comparisons. Receiver operating characteristic analysis identified a -54.8% relative change in total visible retinal leakage area as the optimal cutoff, indicating quiescent inflammation. Conclusions: The deep learning model reliably segments leakage in pediatric uveitis FA, showing multicenter generalizability. Quantitative angiographic parameters correlate with clinical metrics, suggesting potential utility for informing disease management strategies. Financial Disclosures: The author has no/the authors have no proprietary or commercial interest in any materials discussed in this article.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.