SynthesisFrontiers in stroke2026
The APOE paradox: divergent genetic influences on hemorrhagic stroke risk-A meta-analysis.
Synthesis in Frontiers in stroke, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Apolipoprotein E (APOE) regulates lipid metabolism and neuronal repair, yet its alleles show contrasting effects on hemorrhagic stroke (HS) risk. While some variants increase susceptibility, others appear protective, leading to inconsistent findings. This meta-analysis systematically evaluates the APOE-HS association to clarify its role in stroke pathophysiology. Methods: A comprehensive literature search was conducted across multiple databases up to January 31, 2025, using the keywords: ("Apolipoprotein E" OR "APOE" OR "APOE genotype") AND ("Single Nucleotide Polymorphisms" OR "SNP") AND ("Hemorrhagic stroke" OR "HS" OR "Intracerebral Hemorrhage" OR "ICH"). The APOE ε3/ε3 genotype served as the reference genotype in all studies, and only those studies with ε3/ε3 genotype were included in the analysis. Pooled odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated, and statistical analyses were performed using STATA version 13.0 (StataCorp LLC, College Station, Texas, United States). Results: A total of 24 studies comprising 8,269 HS patients and 26,321 controls were included. Meta-analysis revealed a significant association of APOE ε2/ε2 (OR = 1.93, 95% CI = 1.32-2.81), ε4/ε4 (OR = 1.60, 95% CI = 1.21-2.13), ε2/ε4 (OR = 1.81, 95% CI = 1.34-2.44), ε2 (OR = 1.23, 95% CI = 1.12-1.35), and ε4 (OR = 1.31, 95% CI = 1.14-1.51) with an increased risk of HS. Conclusion: Our findings suggest that APOE ε2/ε2, ε2/ε4, ε2, and ε4/ε4 genotypes and the ε4 allele are associated with an elevated risk of HS. These results highlight the potential role of APOE genotypes in HS susceptibility and warrant further investigation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.